From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-8 cut/paste Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:11:48 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <1190-Wed26May2004201148+0300-eliz@gnu.org> References: <9003-Tue25May2004080243+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085724804 19500 80.91.224.253 (28 May 2004 06:13:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 06:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Benjamin.Riefenstahl@epost.de, sds@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 08:13:16 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTacG-00068t-00 for ; Fri, 28 May 2004 08:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTacG-0006RQ-00 for ; Fri, 28 May 2004 08:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT44E-0006Rr-Ks for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT3r7-0003QS-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:14:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT3iQ-0002Ad-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT1za-0004VT-22; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.196.231]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id CYK23009; Wed, 26 May 2004 20:14:10 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Stefan Monnier X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on 26 May 2004 11:48:32 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24059 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24059 > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: 26 May 2004 11:48:32 -0400 > > cp1252 could have been implemented as another charset rather than being > mapped to a mix of 8859-1 and unicode chars. If we did that, it would make the unfortunate situation, whereby there are multiple charsets that cover the same characters, even worse. E.g., in addition to Unicode Cyrillic characters and cyrillic-iso8859-5 Cyrillic characters, we would also have cp1252 Cyrillic characters. Repeat after me: "multiple character sets covering the same characters are BAD."