From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Moringen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add notifications.el Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:30:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1183_1276241420_ZZh0127gAT2R9.00_1276241419.7761.245.camel@azurit.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> References: <13588_1276211690_ZZh01350LoUj0.00_1276211773.5476.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3277_1276238795_o5B6kZER023748_87aar22hj1.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276270149 8246 80.91.229.12 (11 Jun 2010 15:29:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Julien Danjou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 11 17:29:08 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON6AL-0007dK-0m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:29:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40287 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ON6AI-000561-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58336 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMyh6-00068G-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMyh5-0007Yw-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mux1-unibi-smtp.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de ([129.70.204.65]:34660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMyh5-0007YM-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.mux1-unibi-smtp.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de by mux1-unibi-smtp.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-6.03 (built Mar 14 2008; 32bit)) id <0L3U00H00A6KPX00@mux1-unibi-smtp.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:30:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [129.70.143.11] ([129.70.143.11]) by mux1-unibi-smtp.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-6.03 (built Mar 14 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPPSA id <0L3U009G2A6J6F90@mux1-unibi-smtp.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:30:19 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <3277_1276238795_o5B6kZER023748_87aar22hj1.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-EnvFrom: jmoringen@uni-bielefeld.de X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.6.11.71217, pmx8 X-Connecting-IP: 129.70.143.11 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:28:43 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125742 Archived-At: Hi Julien. > > 2. Older versions of libnotify seem to use a slightly different > > interface: it seems like the signal for closing notifications > > does not include a reason (see output of dbus-monitor [1]). I > > suggest making the reason argument in the -on-closed handler > > optional. > > Seems weird to me. Which version do you have? In the packaged NEWS file it says: version 0.4.4 (27-February-2007) > I've implemented version 0.9 of the spec here; there's still version 0.3 > online, and even in that old version there's a reason in the > ClosedNotification signal. Maybe it's a bug in the notification daemon? It happened for every notification I produced from Emacs on this machine. The notifications also varied significantly. So in case of an error it wouldn't exactly be a corner case which makes this possibility seem unlikely. > So if this is real you might have a really really really old version? Doesn't seem /that/ old to me. Kind regards, Jan