From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Mullis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] etags/ctags v22.0.92 break Linux kernel `make TAGS/tags` Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:36:24 -0800 Message-ID: <1167510984.2668.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1166990491.2706.205.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167158597.2706.224.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167284920.2668.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167537695 25096 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2006 04:01:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 31 05:01:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0rt3-0000b1-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 05:01:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0rt3-0007yw-BV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0kwS-0008Bq-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0kwQ-00088b-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:36:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0kwQ-00088V-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:36:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.157.153.23] (helo=outbound0.sv.meer.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H0kwN-0006Jk-9W; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:36:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kBUKaPih050758; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:36:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwm@meer.net) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.1] (covad-dmullis.meer.net [209.157.140.246]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id kBUKaO0t023512; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:36:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwm@meer.net) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:01:18 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64552 Archived-At: On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:58 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > There is another inconvenience, one you may have noticed also -- upon visiting > the TAGS file emacs complains about its size and requires confirmation before > continuing. > > This is controlled by large-file-warning-threshold. It would be ok to > create a separate such variable to apply to tags files only; > visit-tags-table could bind large-file-warning-threshold to that other > value. Thanks for the explanation. Judging only from my own modest user experience, the common large-file-warning-threshold seems adequate to the purpose. Perhaps now might be a good time to raise the default value, though.