From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inhibit-startup-message Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:52:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1137858750.513863.29907.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> References: <1137802780.604272.18936.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <200601211539.k0LFdf925765@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137866166 19295 80.91.229.2 (21 Jan 2006 17:56:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 18:56:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0My1-0001pq-CX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:56:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0MtD-0007Yh-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0LBn-00008Q-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0L70-0006rG-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0L5D-0005ex-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:55:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [130.238.164.5] (helo=elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F0L9d-0004uh-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:59:53 -0500 Original-Received: by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 204) id C74441DA; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:52:40 +0100 (MEZ) Original-Received: from elvira.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by elvira.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s26681; Sat, 21 Jan 06 16:52:33 +0100 Original-Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40691DA; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:52:31 +0100 (MEZ) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EBA4400A; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:52:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00520-01-10; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:52:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from Update.UU.SE (Lem.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.73]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with SMTP id A39DA44006; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:52:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 29908 invoked by uid 30270); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:52:30 -0000 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200601211539.k0LFdf925765@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:39:41 -0600 (CST)) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at Update.UU.SE X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49357 Archived-At: I can not reproduce this with a .emacs containing only: (blink-cursor-mode 0) (diary) Today's diary entry gets shown in a pop-up window. So either this has been fixed in the meantime, or some other customization you made causes this. Doesn't work for me, my *Messages* buffer contains: No diary entries for Saturday, 21 January 2006 For information about the GNU project and its goals, type C-h C-p. It works if you actually have a diary entry though. FYI, tried this all with not customizations. It should not really have anything to do with the problem, but if you want to get rid of startup-echo-area-message, should you not set `inhibit-startup-echo-area-message' instead of `inhibit-startup-message'? I meant really meant `inhibit-startup-echo-area-message', sorry. Setting it to nil still showed the default blurb.