From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:45:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1112165123.424a4b03c2b45@imp6-q.free.fr> References: <8764za5mjn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87ekdy1a4d.fsf@marant.org> Reply-To: jerome.marant@free.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112166012 31089 80.91.229.2 (30 Mar 2005 07:00:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 09:00:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGXB9-0006Tf-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:59:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGXRZ-00076B-9W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGXNw-0006PP-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGXNc-0006Ka-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:12:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGXNb-0006GA-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:12:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.228.0.169] (helo=postfix3-2.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DGWxB-0000Vn-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: from imp6-q.free.fr (imp6-q.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED246C0FC for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by imp6-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id DBC1018EFF; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:45:23 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from mure.msy.sagem.com (mure.msy.sagem.com [62.160.59.178]) by imp6-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:45:23 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 62.160.59.178 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35343 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35343 Quoting Jason Rumney : > Do you use it because jit-lock is insufficient, or just out of habit? I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me that lazy was faster (with 21.3) Cheers, -- J=E9r=F4me Marant