From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode adds newlines Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:09:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1101042567.942507.22881.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> References: <20041119231343.GA19603@apps.cwi.nl> <20041121020850.GA20436@apps.cwi.nl> <20041121113801.GC20436@apps.cwi.nl> <1101038930.033583.22794.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <20041121124544.GF20436@apps.cwi.nl> <1101041892.105110.22863.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <20041121130351.GI20436@apps.cwi.nl> Reply-To: ams@kemisten.nu NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101042619 31355 80.91.229.6 (21 Nov 2004 13:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jari.aalto@cante.net, acm@muc.de, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 21 14:10:10 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CVrTm-00063F-00 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:10:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVrcl-0001y3-RC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVrca-0001vi-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVrcZ-0001uv-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:19:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVrcZ-0001us-T9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [130.238.7.33] (helo=limicola.its.uu.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CVrTF-0001gc-VL; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 5975B48B3; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:09:37 +0100 (MEZ) Original-Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3323; Sun, 21 Nov 04 14:09:29 +0100 Original-Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0D748B3; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:09:29 +0100 (MEZ) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000AC38015; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:09:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Psilocybe [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10573-15; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:09:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from Update.UU.SE (Lem.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.73]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with SMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:09:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 22882 invoked by uid 30270); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:09:28 -0000 Original-To: Andries Brouwer In-reply-to: <20041121130351.GI20436@apps.cwi.nl> (message from Andries Brouwer on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:03:52 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30162 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30162 > And require-final-newline is not good enough for you? You need a > separate c-require-final-newline? > > Did it occur to you You did not answer the question. It is not relevant what I want, but what everyone else wants. Emacs is not _my_ editor, but the editor of several thousand people. It should have such defaults that make sense for the general cases, and should have variables/hooks that can be modifed for those cases where the person dislikes the defaults. So indeed, I did answer your question.