From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: JD Smith Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:12:41 -0700 Message-ID: <1100707961.30850.8.camel@turtle.as.arizona.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100708016 20151 80.91.229.6 (17 Nov 2004 16:13:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 17:13:18 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUSQn-0004Ti-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:13:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUSZb-0006rk-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:22:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUSZT-0006re-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:22:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUSZS-0006rO-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:22:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUSZS-0006rE-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:22:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [128.196.210.37] (helo=nsa.as.arizona.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CUSQP-0002D8-2D; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from biff.as.arizona.edu (biff.as.arizona.edu [128.196.211.142]) by nsa.as.arizona.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAHGCfNt005553; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:12:41 -0700 Original-Received: from [128.196.208.207] (turtle.as.arizona.edu [128.196.208.207]) by biff.as.arizona.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAHGCf5M012939; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:12:41 -0700 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: so3: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.538, required 8, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL 0.28) X-MailScanner-From: jdsmith@as.arizona.edu X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29974 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29974 On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 01:33, Miles Bader wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed these changes in CVS, with the following log entry: > > Updated to IDLWAVE version 5.5. See idlwave.org > > A few little nits: > > (1) When you update files in the Emacs sources from an external copy, > _do not_ just "drop in" your latest version -- there may be > changes to the Emacs copy that will be lost if you do that. > > Instead, either apply a patch from your old version to your new > version to the emacs copy, or generate a patch in the emacs tree > from the last time you merged to the current date, and apply that > patch to your copy before committing it. I figured this would catch some attention. I do apologize for the huge change dump, but idlwave receives much more active development in an external community than is possible within Emacs. I do track your changes regularly, and aside from the RCS, had included everything. In particular, RMS recently contacted me about incorrect usage of interactive-p, which is included in this version. I would be eager ot hear of any other changes I inadvertently lost; it was not my intention. JD > (2) The new files have RCS keywords like: > > ;; Date: $Date: 2004/11/17 05:54:20 $ > > Please do not use these in Emacs source files. [As it happens, > one of Emacs changes lost when you dropped in your new version was > an RCS-keyword removal change.] > > (3) Please provide at least a minimal ChangeLog entry accompanying > your changes. [Maybe you just haven't committed it yet, but it's > been a few hours since your changes, so...] I will update the Changelog. JD