From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71466: 30.0.50; Buffer-menu-group-by non-nil resets point when Buffer List is reverted Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 20:35:47 +0300 Message-ID: <10881a4d-5b44-4b7e-9686-d6f7bf3ddace@gutov.dev> References: <86tthzwgsw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86msnkyt7c.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <30404984-e7ac-4f92-a194-06438dbf2d03@gutov.dev> <867cemquey.fsf@gnu.org> <864j9qqpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <86tthqp2zc.fsf@gnu.org> <86tthnzp19.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21150"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 71466@debbugs.gnu.org, me@eshelyaron.com To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 19:37:29 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLix-0005Du-MP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:37:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLiW-0001KE-4q; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLiU-0001Jo-Nh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLiU-00023y-Fv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLiY-0003ak-DK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71466 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71466-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71466.171890496413706 (code B ref 71466); Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2024 17:36:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLhc-0003Yz-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]:58693) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKLha-0003YP-2a for 71466@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E27F11400CD; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:35:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1718904952; x=1718991352; bh=E0WkRGOxWxArnGeV0vs08WQ4EyIh7LsJUpPhhBvgmGU=; b= dm3qWVuCM3Tkcg9HurvbMb6ofX+wGHMx1kxNTeS9hsqpdotcXKPhnBfu52w0RJQ2 PhlkOnyRmTpYxyXqQ88jOg+6+N+vErYb9NrjjoKC1I2NY67BiMxBdH//6dGp2zVv G/CBn0Zrb+Kr5ZjXLuPCcl+GJA5r10D4gU/Sxru4FBphx8koQcNbRpwpYxJL/gOA cl2Tfif4db2iTxTE64jkAJMdg7uQxtO45WRaXQbdQuvmOmchptthg6AMZk0FyMJJ bvK/T0Ggl2feu+KM/8dGS7iOwVkjy/Gl5wcBStsbJtE8I4l7vO+eM/S8+yXujbsU UYg7WrSm9wOYniStiGH6Kw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1718904952; x= 1718991352; bh=E0WkRGOxWxArnGeV0vs08WQ4EyIh7LsJUpPhhBvgmGU=; b=N NHFe2r3i6ybdC1qEi8sUrUrYtIAyssn8fJ7WzT3d/cnhH7phkIhw7NpgqnvAL5J/ 4dyWrPDcVq6y5ona8HtnuIA0hP3q59FSEeg4PcenZ+IBn6PDpXTG7Y3/XPaLwuJn lYrDR6PFmNk6C8sK/IPKoBzbaSsfmuEtR+LRUXFw//5FrRsaIutKJx5gBTvK8mxz 5RlYTrWFxFJJRD93Rnr6tCpYMOOWMtJvGgy1exqZNGwbftDrqi/2oBfVKWKwUz9h jGvshzF8deugEuTtd+J+pEhR+9GYwCPhIOgK1TV5t7mWqBAPV4ZA/lRAxk/yB9b/ xWXvmmqfs6o9lMeqIiEwA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeefvddgudduiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthejredttddvjeenucfhrhhomhepffhm ihhtrhihucfiuhhtohhvuceoughmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeetudeljeegheetgfehgeejkeeuhedvveeikeeufedtvddtveefhfdvveeg udejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe gumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:35:50 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86tthnzp19.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287579 Archived-At: On 20/06/2024 19:38, Juri Linkov wrote: > So what is the decision? Maybe better to keep xref-revert-buffer > as a wrapper around the new function xref--revert-buffer? That should work, though at the expense of duplicating some code.