From: Greg Minshall <minshall@umich.edu>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [FR, DISCUSSION] Re: [:results append] and [:wrap ...] don't play well together
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 15:23:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <104487.1660083811@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tu6rnsbn.fsf@localhost>
Ihor,
thanks for your e-mail and explanation.
> We may clarify this in the manual.
probably worth doing. though, trying to describe it succinctly will be
a challenge, i think!
> Another alternative could be treating
> :results append drawer/code/pp/org/latex/html
> differently and putting everything into a single drawer/src/export
> environment like:
>
> #+begin_src R :results append :wrap foo
> Sys.time()
> #+end_src
>
> #3:
>
> #+RESULTS:
> #+begin_foo
> 2021-03-31 05:51:08
> 2021-03-31 05:51:10
> 2021-03-31 05:51:12
> #+end_foo
>
> However, changing the behaviour will be a breaking change, which we do
> not want for the sake of back-compatibility.
>
> Instead, we may introduce something like
> :results append-contents drawer
> that will behave like the above.
>
> Is there a demand to have such a feature?
i suspect that at some point, it would be nice to have org be able to
"understand" how results of previous evaluations are laid out in the
buffer. whether the need is now, i'm not sure (i can live without it).
(in the documentation you suggest above, it may help to have such an
option to point at; i.e., "if you don't really understand this, but want
something like this, try this option" :)
cheers, Greg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-31 2:56 [:results append] and [:wrap ...] don't play well together Greg Minshall
2022-08-05 5:59 ` [FR, DISCUSSION] " Ihor Radchenko
2022-08-09 22:23 ` Greg Minshall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=104487.1660083811@archlinux \
--to=minshall@umich.edu \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=yantar92@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.