From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6505: make the Gtk+ port compile with -DGSEAL_ENABLE in preparation for Gtk+-3 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:02:03 -0400 Message-ID: <0iwrtmygfo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <4C24B408.5050703@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277501418 25272 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2010 21:30:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6505@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 25 23:30:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSGTU-0008Ju-PQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:30:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSGTT-0008Bh-V8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54609 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSGSb-0007ln-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSGSa-00051O-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSGSa-00051K-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSG3B-0003Lr-V1; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6505 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6505-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6505.127749972912877 (code B ref 6505); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2010 21:02:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSG2L-0003Le-74 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSG2J-0003LZ-EJ for 6505@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSG2F-0000ob-5S; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:02:03 -0400 X-Spook: Ft. Bragg Ortega basement doctrine gamma Jyllandsposten X-Ran: izinjRLC8?`VNUd6lY`*(vw.#7%UJ5e^\)`io=ywvazNCU/[M)wvSP^LWQFxbqc]4?YsJZ X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:03:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38012 Archived-At: Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: > That said, I have a private branch that works with Gtk+ 3.0, and some > of the fixes there can go in the trunk. Maybe we should bump required > to 2.14 and get most of the work checked in. For the record, RHEL 5, the most recent Red Hat Enterprise Linux, only has 2.10. I don't have an opinion whether that is important or not. There will probably be a RHEL 6 (with 2.18) before Emacs 24.1.