From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57102: 29.0.50; Peculiar file-name-split edge case Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:27:59 +0000 Message-ID: <0f4ca4f3318d4005587a@heytings.org> References: <87a68cwlnv.fsf@posteo.net> <4ECBBAD8-732D-4235-BB7C-003E226543C0@acm.org> <87r0zya04n.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34548"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 57102@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 14:44:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnSx-0008nq-K0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:44:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnSw-0006Pa-JT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnEN-0002Nw-EA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnEM-0002xQ-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnEM-0001ts-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57102 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57102-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57102.16641952837213 (code B ref 57102); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57102) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2022 12:28:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnDP-0001sH-9f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:59218) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocnDN-0001rr-7M for 57102@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:28:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1664195279; bh=sdv+UWDiKsPwOy/ctyjJFSejETgBre66iX7i6TH4uhA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=NoqTqMGqT4jopOyDZIJZmWNuGxYX435HzNzFM+tOigmVxbKeoZkTOXwkzBA0PEiSz w//HruEmLhNtilZcMetSJHyXzbtZHCpW6+4SUZUHmDdpYf56/5FedvM8xbuqTiwvvC IU704xtQ5MUOtBZa0h0N8Nksnx0ASfpAQavQkO95ajyJsme5WItEzG6Vc4o/E3W6lv zbABjK3ddl5tvZyQ897XkCrGBpTrQ0m5o0JCFFajBclIAfdwy+bqM0PIugfDSCZ0Rs WGcTcMD/CwTAOqGI1jfLHzK6ECLdU0KKpnPX3gb7eIJG774OOM8Dk5QLFqhLNhal6t AmQZz+R+sBH6A== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243651 Archived-At: >> One small step in the right direction would be to make sure that: >> >> (equal (file-name-split "/foo") >> (file-name-split "//foo")) > > There's the Posix peculiarity that /abc and //abc are potentially > distinct, but ///abc should be equivalent to /abc if I understood it > right. > Indeed, POSIX says that "A pathname that begins with two successive characters may be interpreted in an implementation-defined manner, although more than two leading characters shall be treated as a single character."