From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61504: 29.0.60; executing byte-code from previous build causes SIGSEGV crash Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:44:46 +0000 Message-ID: <0f053182b06c8bc5bbbb@heytings.org> References: <0f053182b047f142abcf@heytings.org> <833578e5o1.fsf@gnu.org> <0f053182b0078c2103a9@heytings.org> <83fsb8cgm2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34213"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mi-ebugs@kismala.com, mattiase@acm.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 61504@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 14 21:45:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2B3-0008l8-Mc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:45:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2Al-00022T-0V; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2Ag-00022C-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2Ag-0002xa-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2Af-0003F3-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61504 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61504-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61504.167640749312429 (code B ref 61504); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2023 20:44:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57130 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2AT-0003EM-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:44:52 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:56998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pS2AS-0003EE-8V for 61504@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:44:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676407487; bh=a1wu8LAkTmrDMYjmQoOE4+0pUiFhZ1x8k46HFLjU4gA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=ZXEu+Zd4CWJBw2wZXvRt8RR0mqpjaSVsU4C5WKDRa2ZNSxtYkra1/dwciO0XAn6Ry ffhHsnURmFoJCcZ9cpxd+2Ukmvr5itVsXPsymovS13qOGeQWxAsuNJNHozPLsQKN3H AGTlMFHZVw+IFP00FFg4AglsBn4l3bTViM3vw0GK4aflzRk+a3EvroZdAawVizdZm4 tqdQPPai6v1OotVHPpDVIf02MDh4keXbevz4+5b2zEnk5G4u92xEu/txIq4ljRXuRL vh1nhsklz0ET9m7g1WT7TmwEDdN1IDSD/58E+1QHCtzSHbLWIiq0CO8nfrLhASZOr1 RnPrVhD5nUrFA== In-Reply-To: <83fsb8cgm2.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255631 Archived-At: >> Hmmm, that's a good question! The evaluation order of parameters is >> unspecified in C, so actually the order could be switched or not, >> depending on what the compiler chooses to do. > > But you could rewrite the code so that the parameters are evaluated one > after the other, and only after that call Fcons. The compiler could > still change the order, but that would be less probable. > Agreed. >> That being said, AFAICS it doesn't matter in this case, indeed. > > It is IME better to write code that doesn't trigger such questions to > begin with. > Agreed again. >> Eli, OK to install? > > With the change of order per the above, yes. > Now done.