From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19479: Copyright issue Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:24:50 -0500 Message-ID: <0etwzzu2gd.fsf__24913.8579624288$1420835115$gmane$org@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420835115 15520 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2015 20:25:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, assign@gnu.org, 19479@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 09 21:25:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g7J-0006mS-25 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:25:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g7I-0006XR-As for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g7D-0006TK-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:25:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g7D-0003rx-0N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g7C-0003re-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g7C-0003CP-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 19479-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19479.142083509512279 (code B ref 19479); Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19479) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2015 20:24:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g75-0003By-3T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:24:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:57844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g72-0003Bq-KV for 19479@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9g71-0001Ql-8L; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:24:51 -0500 X-Spook: SAFE advisors interception spies Ft. Bragg AIMSX TELINT X-Ran: ^)zT,L|0kv7t:`]$UsuBE!3b&?hP|A`vOh6Gx|X,:z^'\7kTz`GkPMJf$g/>6*c=yn'cE_ X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Kelly Dean's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:57:35 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98141 Archived-At: I must say, that it was not my impression that disclaimers were not accaptable for Emacs. Only that the FSF does not offer a "past and future" option for disclaimers like it does for assignments, so a new disclaimer would have to be completed for every new change. I thought this was not worth bothering with, so I advised you not to send more patches. But I certainly don't know, I just go with whatever assign@gnu says. I don't see much point discussing this on emacs-devel. None of us are lawyers so our opinions are pretty irrelevant. We need to wait and see what assign@gnu says.