From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Urban Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200 Message-ID: <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="208615"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 07 23:15:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i38-000s9e-0O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 23:15:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i36-0000zk-OJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2x-0000zL-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2w-0000Fq-Uo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2w-0000FF-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2w-0001MR-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Urban Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 21:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37324 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37324-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37324.15678908815132 (code B ref 37324); Sat, 07 Sep 2019 21:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2019 21:14:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2b-0001Kh-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:32810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2Z-0001KR-Dd for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:14:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id r17so9910954wme.0 for <37324@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:14:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4gnsfEytBBwMEhLhH81M55/ZuJmCiWB/2lrAt9UO1ZA=; b=muf7+mR0atICQZbPrkvKjU+zVb9mjJEWogaNhDvwcRx0VsNzOaGFVz2zHSRPCEMrgd H9nvI0ldMFwHYTA99JcgATJrBwiTugv4Qbx8TaEfQGLRSmfZvefQfb2bmP4nPq3/Xr1r zKSwvoRJEHZeHwsziqHq8gGq3oaoyk6TlmvVHZqNl3QTPdkw2D7UBphO/eHLURoaYKsa LsC1Okb/lbeXMGqIcmFY0xqCjcpuW0677W581Wfg4szDFpjZnGhSTz/Ymm0zH/F2xPYE fMpz/08F/HSJ3RorPDY7COl0xVNwfKQqtjja3LAddNpPl0Ipn9zmcsHMbd2CdCzN/GF4 pnrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4gnsfEytBBwMEhLhH81M55/ZuJmCiWB/2lrAt9UO1ZA=; b=JKC8yMPw2qEpHNdG2SYFpo6L2LyZSEx6N138+69iqQ83eDUIzDDVT97ocqDYwAXDlS 9VfS9/0SDzv5KuMkUe6oNOq0o4OmasQRtgWF+HjHZ4JP1QARqIC6EMw4nJjcBlnH8Gbx 4wFeEUnTUhkK++e4xK0ffmZ90bsVdOzfnvoIJCEusZj7iq7d9Yn57dGj2P+MghPLS1ET ItV+JsWfprxuhnjCBX3Yp7Whd9MoTm39Vj96cHU6YkokCxAuCtux9IzYww9bM7Kg7G95 JqMDiHjyd8a63jPq6UHUgPpFgirAltW1bXE7nmoOFwM8oEcIWUb4UaBupbyW4wFLV7ZT 3E0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUy7i9VzDbOvWg9WSSSwh23TSAM74UQWRBptJ570S3REHBlv1fG 7q/YysNL2oXq0Io4Wholt/0NYtXgCYyQvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQ0N36x6aoBsMGUZASKvBd/pNjIGtJGgmEaoqy7ZA6A58CpjxnaK1763PGqkvly0aPEXZSSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd05:: with SMTP id f5mr12213369wmj.12.1567890873446; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:f41:1cae:b041:90df:5475:6184:6e6? ([2a00:f41:1cae:b041:90df:5475:6184:6e6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y72sm17859055wmc.26.2019.09.07.14.14.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:14:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166280 Archived-At: >> In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters >> - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) >> + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) >> (...) >> I think there is one unnecessary "space". > > That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the > next. Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example - before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code (well, perhaps 1 is needed). But... is changing the insides of the code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable? If everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone may think that there is an error in the code example.