From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59347: 29.0.50; `:family` face setting ignored Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:39:16 +0000 Message-ID: <0d1ea3007f4b5ca9c1c3@heytings.org> References: <83bkp4bfqf.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn7s9txp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmdk9pat.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz9j9zyu.fsf@gnu.org> <838rk77yfo.fsf@gnu.org> <834juu9aya.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786024fc72f3b@heytings.org> <83a64l65ai.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e0378678a092e6ee@heytings.org> <835yf962q4.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786754c9e0aaf@heytings.org> <83zgcl4jra.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786c281cffdd4@heytings.org> <83tu2t4ie9.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786e324ff82ef@heytings.org> <83bkp04gjl.fsf@gnu.org> <83leo42vm9.fsf@gnu.org> <83edtv12ru.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 59347@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 15:40:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxURt-00053E-16 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:40:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxURY-0008IB-AN; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxURP-0008HK-GL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:40:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxURO-0001d9-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxURO-0002Sa-IE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59347 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59347-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59347.16691279619404 (code B ref 59347); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59347) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2022 14:39:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUQj-0002Rc-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:39:21 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:54522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUQg-0002RT-DL for 59347@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:39:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1669127957; bh=tnguh3kVFgzXe/5aVrR0w5a8dEQBwUu2zHRFT1C1+Jc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=b96fkGSfvCXRTxBS2Nou3k2IpSSLPquG9mWF/7hTOuP6oqPtYsaMPV4eYNIo6yXxp 4eevsgjycEXpFPvHU5M55XpwQ55lg947rTH8L+uWZR2wbngmyp7DgBP4k/lsYKVucX ku9WfipEJP3M6mYyaqOykg5+6hyvh2S5HuF//8VMQaPWJwlu9/TLeg6f48WTON/lyp Rib3z9+jq4YaucEs00bhgrnVUX1gh0Y0ykMREOEmHl+PjRWSjElasvo0T6HXBopEfR Qwmr01zOCHXsGDlDj15nlemos4G/a0XKX/vsOqZt4/ChaU7d3rXDQgEx/kLSLl0zxA mKRpC66lYhIiQ== In-Reply-To: <83edtv12ru.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248644 Archived-At: >> With current master, the variable-pitch face is realized as follows: >> >> - with 1-3: -ADBO-Source Code Pro-black-normal-normal-*-29-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1, which is a monospace font >> >> - with 4: -PfEd-DejaVu Sans-bold-normal-normal-*-29-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1, which is a variable pitch font >> >> - with 5: -ADBO-Source Code Pro-semibold-normal-normal-*-29-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1, which is again a monospace font >> >> - with 6: -urw-nimbus sans l-regular-r-normal--29-210-100-100-p-158-iso8859-1, which is a variable pitch font but without anti-aliasing >> >> - with 7: -PfEd-DejaVu Sans-regular-normal-normal-*-29-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1, which is a variable pitch font >> >> - with 8-9: -ADBO-Source Code Pro-light-normal-normal-*-29-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1, which is again a monospace font >> >> - with 10-11: -PfEd-DejaVu Sans-ultralight-normal-normal-*-29-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1, which is a variable pitch font >> >> That can't be right. Only 4, 7, and 10-11 correspond to what is >> expected for that face, namely a variable pitch font. > > Why do you expect to get a variable pitch font? > The variable-pitch face should use a variable pitch font, shouldn't it? Unless there are no such fonts installed on the computer of course, in which case it could fall back to a monospace font. > > Emacs tries to find a font from the same family, but if that fails for > some reason, all bets are off wrt whether the font we find will be > variable-pitch or not. Or what am I missing? > Why should the weight of the default face influence the font selected for the variable-pitch face, to the point that even when variable pitch fonts are installed on the computer, they are all flatly rejected because they do not explicitly support say the 'semi-bold' weight? The weight of the default face should only influence the weight of the other faces, which is what it does with the patch. With a 'semi-bold' default face, a 'bold' variable pitch font is a legitimate candidate for the variable-pitch face.