From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35737: xref--original-command Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:44:04 +0300 Message-ID: <0b28717b-7e2b-39bf-1d6a-27127669265c@yandex.ru> References: <87ftpgu59l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <56943df5-f366-a8af-cb95-a40c244da837@yandex.ru> <87tvdvpgzj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87woiqkwok.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r28nenzk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8736kzekie.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <413fa232-ea7f-bd6a-ecce-632962a7f57e@yandex.ru> <87sgsyfoct.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="18399"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 To: 35737@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 10 01:45:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Ut-0004eA-AU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 01:45:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Us-0000vh-2o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Ul-0000vK-9E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Uk-0001uR-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Uk-0001uN-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Uj-0007Pc-Rp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 23:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35737-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35737.156012385628423 (code B ref 35737); Sun, 09 Jun 2019 23:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2019 23:44:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Tz-0007ON-V7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:44:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:46081) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha7Ty-0007O8-2c for 35737@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:44:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id n4so7267826wrw.13 for <35737@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 16:44:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kHGtu6yEx4YoC/bf+DMwj75+P9h4vlT4v5hV1MgoaxY=; b=qM543d3m8MoZ8drYehrVQrRwb0qHwPQMTm0vNBf7jk2L28qzMdV8/BrbgZHz5bVPLz tqnK7NrBQs0AWn1wrwz8hdVcUSclrHjMT7eMAn7W2XKHbVDaoe9R6Bit1Z7EH/iJmFD3 JPhEXRw2B//6qs0EhIbXNtztG7eN9nk59QylEYObkS/eM6eVw+nTnfJdxvyr0zsIGAht DQz+rVZj5zfTVy9zfSCjkY2js7D9skbmCnCaEI+tG9FogiXgp1SBohkmgQCPdyt29tNn Y1673GEssYnr6bNNbQ0OZ36BGNaHDKx2oSLgxJVydXxgvTvoOlQs7Ii6XQtPy7V1d34S 5UxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kHGtu6yEx4YoC/bf+DMwj75+P9h4vlT4v5hV1MgoaxY=; b=p2doEiE2hkg/+pv8yqtR9HrZYgaVTnLc9z4kqZaV8uCvR+uXpoSQoQ66MsgOPSGcpe 3xkVjD7smE3lBBn6xLkzfkHRcZYRYiLdPBz+AOv1+8DZdebOKqgXkQyb+tITWu//RjR8 JTGecpcf8SRRQiwh5uwWUkkQml16Uza7tj4d4DWViDN/09GoFDD6pOayeul3SqQqlXYp qi5LewnSK/cC84vxCSzm5i6FDzHpIQs7PAPeDIfEKYodbzN9KxYB8ghF+rf/e6KGA1kE LmzqnjTe1RLK2h3MH+ThGHnACyFSCfIkXQCeSvbYcN8owkebVNc7JBzSMv1pH8VzUjK1 OWRg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVLIjG9MzXLlYikh/Dy+lOH9Vw3qbFlcfgm9Lv3C7wq577yhUTj Ydv5wpFvo2ExNLXI+3CEAYdwkPg1qjQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzYgu72Hb0r/WcQtn58+tSxe0VZH548qYscK2MDtPTniGO9myN8b507hZKKI5av9ZAdUZ0G/A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:db8e:: with SMTP id u14mr14133179wri.190.1560123848089; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 16:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j132sm15954189wmj.21.2019.06.09.16.44.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Jun 2019 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sgsyfoct.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160304 Archived-At: On 28.05.2019 23:30, Juri Linkov wrote: >> Anyway, I was hoping my efforts in improving the default behavior would >> benefit your goals as well, but it seems the split between xref--show-xrefs >> and xref--show-defs goes against them. That's too bad. > > Thanks for your efforts. Your recent changes would be useful for other goals, > e.g. making the xref output to use grep-like output format. Not sure what you mean, but if you mean altering the behavior for all-commands-except-xref-find-definitions, then sure. Not sure why you think the split is helpful for this but not your present goal, though. >> So, to clarify, you're not interested in changing the *visible* default >> behavior, at least for now? > > No, not a visual change this time. I'd also close bug#33992 because > it's also leading nowhere. But maybe your recent patch with > xref--definitions-buffer-mode is an improvement, I don't know. That patch is a lateral move, to make experimenting with this particular behavior change easier. I've installed in the meantime. > I'm looking at xref from customization's point of view, and I see no more > improvements that could simplify xref customization. OK. If you have any further ideas, please don't hesitate to bring them up.