From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:17:18 -0500 Message-ID: <0E1EB8C9-8692-48F6-BBA0-826DCA7F819B@redhat.com> References: <6eh8u7x5be.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> <5C8038D7-FF85-4C42-A728-F3F85CDAC85C@permabit.com> <87efpb46sp.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <3EB0E53F-4B99-44C2-9F2E-1125A33E408B@permabit.com> <877etodc4b.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513316173 27178 195.159.176.226 (15 Dec 2017 05:36:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Philipp Stephani , 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 15 06:36:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePifH-0006Yt-A1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:36:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44539 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePifL-0008JM-3m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:36:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePifF-0008J6-9x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePifC-000152-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePifC-00014q-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePifB-0005d8-PM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ken Raeburn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 29165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29165.151331611121573 (code B ref 29165); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2017 05:35:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePieL-0005br-2Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:35:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]:43287) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePiNC-0005B5-Cb for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:17:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j207so9052783qke.10 for <29165@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:17:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SDr4WzjXuOv5x7t5tE9zYdlKER2RGo4uyqRZUYus7/8=; b=m972cw181YP63LKBanIW8WXE3C4Qmu/hmTA/IE+dpE9EUVwYA+9GFd+N09JCvgvJVa L0KhbYDhh5qUBUpGgXK0FDxxHVYNex4aa2q/pk3jpo2nG9dCoGosFq7BM6rIWb4qmQqF 72LhtCzsu84Z9j+hZNkK7vuX/2djCRmiNY6e/j7usVVHCRbibCtTn567llWDOTj3fu5+ yHpr513QxDWRGVdkHE2GGgOmyjSY8M/1D2QQKOFsZ9LGEZ6VbH1Aa5NkbNImNpPUoIOS B4qCDWjgRf3N5/5iaEN/TpCWDrS4FhM8whVbThccGM+GL+Vbv5yrHNeiKjJKv2HyvQ2n qFXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIhEna7yzcDHXVYX6VGWFVQrNYtCgzeGnroLru4mU/cJL/aHf8S rc0KLiWTGBZmKVLu0DMssW2RJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouhLHonFGAfEw9QjAnoAqkfwCYAQyKqVYT3n/ApBHBVZUVmEHwZvXS1PHOKM+ldxZYDqJVHAg== X-Received: by 10.55.174.132 with SMTP id x126mr20684992qke.101.1513315040811; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:17:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.23.135] (c-73-253-167-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.253.167.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm1735880qtv.23.2017.12.14.21.17.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:17:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:35:07 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141094 Archived-At: On Dec 14, 2017, at 22:04, Stefan Monnier = wrote: >> I don't see the use case for empty &aux, but I don't mind reverting = that >> change. >=20 > It's typically when you define a function from within a macro so you = may > have something like [=E2=80=A6] Why is this different from "=E2=80=A6 &optional ,@optargs=E2=80=9D in a = similar form, when optargs could have no elements? Rejecting that was = (part of) the point of Noam=E2=80=99s change (and the previous change = for bug 24913). I think I=E2=80=99ve already made my objection to that = part plain, but it seems like rejecting an empty &optional and accepting = an empty &aux would be inconsistent. Ken=