* bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files
@ 2015-05-06 23:35 Alan Morgan
2015-05-15 20:39 ` bug#20521: Bug 2051 Alan Morgan
2015-05-27 16:50 ` bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode Alan Morgan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Morgan @ 2015-05-06 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kifer, 20521
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6293 bytes --]
Congratulations! You may have unearthed a bug in Viper!
Please mail a concise, accurate summary of the problem to the address above.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't have a reproducible case (sorry) and am working on debugging
this myself, but it's hard to reproduce. I have emacs up all the time
and I've noticed that after "a few hours" viper-mode won't be entered in
automatically for new buffers (loaded with C-x C-f or :r. It doesn't
seem to matter). I have to M-x viper-mode manually.
Up until this point I've focused on set-viper-state-in-major-mode. It
looks like viper-current-state is set to vi-state even though I'm not in
viper-mode. This seems wrong to me (I'm assuming this state is only set
when in viper-mode), but I can't figure out how it's happening.
Googling has not been productive yet, hence this (rather unhelpful, I imagine) bug report.
Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
of 2015-04-05 on KAEL
Package: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013
current state:
==============
(setq
viper-vi-minibuffer-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-minibuffer-minor-mode nil
viper-vi-intercept-minor-mode t
viper-vi-local-user-minor-mode t
viper-vi-kbd-minor-mode t
viper-vi-global-user-minor-mode t
viper-vi-state-modifier-minor-mode t
viper-vi-diehard-minor-mode nil
viper-vi-basic-minor-mode t
viper-replace-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-intercept-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-local-user-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-kbd-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-global-user-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-state-modifier-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-diehard-minor-mode nil
viper-insert-basic-minor-mode nil
viper-emacs-intercept-minor-mode nil
viper-emacs-local-user-minor-mode nil
viper-emacs-kbd-minor-mode nil
viper-emacs-global-user-minor-mode nil
viper-emacs-state-modifier-minor-mode nil
viper-automatic-iso-accents nil
viper-special-input-method nil
viper-want-emacs-keys-in-insert nil
viper-want-emacs-keys-in-vi t
viper-keep-point-on-undo nil
viper-no-multiple-ESC nil
viper-electric-mode t
viper-ESC-key [escape]
viper-want-ctl-h-help nil
viper-ex-style-editing t
viper-delete-backwards-in-replace nil
viper-vi-style-in-minibuffer t
viper-vi-state-hook 'viper-restore-cursor-type
viper-insert-state-hook 'viper-set-insert-cursor-type
viper-replace-state-hook 'viper-restore-cursor-type
viper-emacs-state-hook 'viper-restore-cursor-type
ex-cycle-other-window t
ex-cycle-through-non-files nil
viper-expert-level 2
major-mode 'emacs-lisp-mode
viper-device-type 'w32
color-display-p t
frame-parameters '((tool-bar-position . top) (parent-id) (explicit-name) (display . "w32")
(visibility . t) (icon-name) (window-id . "132178") (top + -8) (left + -8)
(buried-buffer-list #<buffer *Completions*> #<buffer *viper-ask-level*>)
(buffer-list #<buffer viper.el> #<buffer *Minibuf-1*> #<buffer buildRelease>
#<buffer build_publish.xml> #<buffer *Buffer List*> #<buffer viper.notes.txt>
#<buffer *Messages*> #<buffer *grep*> #<buffer configure<main>> #<buffer main>
#<buffer build_policies.pl> #<buffer PSRTestPolicies.xml> #<buffer Engine.java>
#<buffer *GNU Emacs*> #<buffer *scratch*>)
(unsplittable) (minibuffer . #<window 4 on *Minibuf-0*>) (modeline . t)
(width . 211) (height . 52) (name . "emacs@MANN")
(viper-vi-state-cursor-color . "dodgerblue")
(viper-saved-cursor-color-in-replace-mode . "dodgerblue") (environment)
(cursor-color . "dodgerblue") (background-mode . dark) (display-type . color)
(horizontal-scroll-bars . t) (window-system . w32) (scroll-bar-width . 0)
(cursor-type . box) (auto-lower) (auto-raise) (icon-type) (fullscreen . maximized)
(title) (buffer-predicate) (tool-bar-lines . 0) (menu-bar-lines . 1) (alpha)
(right-fringe . 9) (left-fringe . 9) (line-spacing) (screen-gamma)
(border-color . "black") (mouse-color . "green")
(background-color . "darkslategrey") (foreground-color . "white")
(vertical-scroll-bars) (bottom-divider-width . 0) (right-divider-width . 0)
(internal-border-width . 0) (border-width . 2)
(font . "-outline-Consolas-normal-normal-normal-mono-16-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1")
(font-backend uniscribe gdi))
minibuffer-vi-face [face unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified]
minibuffer-insert-face [face unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified]
minibuffer-emacs-face [face unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified]
)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is made on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the preparation of this material as at this date, and are subject to change without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender at NextLabs Inc and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments from your system. ======================================================================
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13474 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: Bug 2051
2015-05-06 23:35 bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files Alan Morgan
@ 2015-05-15 20:39 ` Alan Morgan
2015-05-15 21:08 ` Nick Andryshak
2015-05-27 16:50 ` bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode Alan Morgan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Morgan @ 2015-05-15 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2801 bytes --]
I have more information on this bug, although I still don't have a reproducible case. The problem happens when the *global* value of viper-current-state is changed from emacs-state to vi-state. Once this happens we are in trouble, because new buffers will not be assigned the vi key-bindings so anything other than cursor movement keys and a few others will do nothing. I made the following changes to viper-cmd.el in the function viper-change-state:
;; Always turn off quail mode in vi state
(cond ((eq new-state 'vi-state) (viper-set-input-method nil)) ;intl input off
(viper-special-input-method (viper-set-input-method t)) ;intl input on
(t (viper-set-input-method nil)))
(message (concat "Setting viper-current-state from " (prin1-to-string viper-current-state) " to " (prin1-to-string new-state) " via setq"))
(global-viper-current-state)
(setq viper-current-state new-state)
(global-viper-current-state)
Global-viper-current-state is defined as follows:
(defun global-viper-current-state ()
(message (concat "The global value of viper-current-state is " (prin1-to-string (default-value 'viper-current-state)))))
Most of the time I see the following:
Setting viper-current-state from emacs-state to insert-state via setq
The global value of viper-current-state is emacs-state [2 times]
But then, for no reason that I could see, I saw this:
Setting viper-current-state from emacs-state to vi-state via setq
The global value of viper-current-state is emacs-state
The global value of viper-current-state is vi-state
How on Earth? Perhaps setq is broken. Perhaps we aren't actually *in* a buffer when setq is called (is that possible?) and thus the global value is being set. I don't understand how this is possible and, now that I've uncovered this, I'm not sure what I can do to fix it.
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is made on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the preparation of this material as at this date, and are subject to change without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender at NextLabs Inc and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments from your system. ======================================================================
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5762 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: Bug 2051
2015-05-15 20:39 ` bug#20521: Bug 2051 Alan Morgan
@ 2015-05-15 21:08 ` Nick Andryshak
2015-05-15 21:42 ` Drew Adams
2015-05-15 21:51 ` Alan Morgan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nick Andryshak @ 2015-05-15 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Morgan; +Cc: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
> How on Earth? Perhaps setq is broken.
That's really not something you should say lightly!
> Perhaps we aren't actually *in* a buffer when setq is called (is that
> possible?) and thus the global value is being set. I don't understand
> how this is possible and, now that I've uncovered this, I'm not sure
> what I can do to fix it.
I think you may misunderstand: setq always sets a global variable.
Perhaps you want to use setq-local?
See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Global-Variables.html
- Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: Bug 2051
2015-05-15 21:08 ` Nick Andryshak
@ 2015-05-15 21:42 ` Drew Adams
2015-05-15 23:24 ` Nick Andryshak
2015-05-15 21:51 ` Alan Morgan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2015-05-15 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Andryshak, Alan Morgan; +Cc: 20521
> I think you may misunderstand: setq always sets a global variable.
Since when?
-- Macro: setq-local variable value
This macro creates a buffer-local binding in the current buffer for
VARIABLE, and gives it the buffer-local value VALUE. It is
equivalent to calling `make-local-variable' followed by `setq'.
VARIABLE should be an unquoted symbol.
Note the last sentence, which points out that `setq' does not always
set a global variable. If it did, then so would `setq-local',
according to that text.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: Bug 2051
2015-05-15 21:42 ` Drew Adams
@ 2015-05-15 23:24 ` Nick Andryshak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nick Andryshak @ 2015-05-15 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Adams; +Cc: Alan Morgan, 20521
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 717 bytes --]
Interesting, thanks. I suppose I misunderstand the manual page that I
linked.
- Nick
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> > I think you may misunderstand: setq always sets a global variable.
>
> Since when?
>
> -- Macro: setq-local variable value
> This macro creates a buffer-local binding in the current buffer for
> VARIABLE, and gives it the buffer-local value VALUE. It is
> equivalent to calling `make-local-variable' followed by `setq'.
> VARIABLE should be an unquoted symbol.
>
> Note the last sentence, which points out that `setq' does not always
> set a global variable. If it did, then so would `setq-local',
> according to that text.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1133 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: Bug 2051
2015-05-15 21:08 ` Nick Andryshak
2015-05-15 21:42 ` Drew Adams
@ 2015-05-15 21:51 ` Alan Morgan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Morgan @ 2015-05-15 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Andryshak; +Cc: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
I shouldn't have used the term "global". I meant "default". If the variable is buffer-local then setq should set the buffer-local value and *not* the default value.
In this situation is looks like setq is *sometimes* setting the default value of a buffer local variable.
setq-local is the same as calling make-local-variable followed by setq
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Andryshak [mailto:nandryshak@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:08 PM
To: Alan Morgan
Cc: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20521: Bug 2051
> How on Earth? Perhaps setq is broken.
That's really not something you should say lightly!
> Perhaps we aren't actually *in* a buffer when setq is called (is that
> possible?) and thus the global value is being set. I don't understand
> how this is possible and, now that I've uncovered this, I'm not sure
> what I can do to fix it.
I think you may misunderstand: setq always sets a global variable.
Perhaps you want to use setq-local?
See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Global-Variables.html
- Nick
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is made on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the preparation of this material as at this date, and are subject to change without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender at NextLabs Inc and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments from your system. ======================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode
2015-05-06 23:35 bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files Alan Morgan
2015-05-15 20:39 ` bug#20521: Bug 2051 Alan Morgan
@ 2015-05-27 16:50 ` Alan Morgan
2015-05-27 22:28 ` Johan Bockgård
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Morgan @ 2015-05-27 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1627 bytes --]
I must be going crazy. Here is my latest sanity check code in viper-check-state in viper-cmd.el
(when (eq (default-value 'viper-current-state) 'vi-state)
(message "Doomed going in"))
(setq-local viper-current-state new-state)
(when (eq (default-value 'viper-current-state) 'vi-state)
(message "Doomed. viper-current-state is now vi-state"))
The setq-local replaces a simple setq at about line 380. When the problem starts I see the "Doomed. Viper-current-state is now vi-state", but I do *not* see the "Doomed going in" message. This implies that setq-local is setting the default value of the variable and that really shouldn't be possible. Either I'm nuts or this is an emacs bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is made on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the preparation of this material as at this date, and are subject to change without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender at NextLabs Inc and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments from your system. ======================================================================
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3693 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode
2015-05-27 16:50 ` bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode Alan Morgan
@ 2015-05-27 22:28 ` Johan Bockgård
2015-05-28 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-02-10 8:11 ` bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Johan Bockgård @ 2015-05-27 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Morgan; +Cc: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
Alan Morgan <Alan.Morgan@nextlabs.com> writes:
> I must be going crazy. Here is my latest sanity check code in
> viper-check-state in viper-cmd.el
>
> (when (eq (default-value 'viper-current-state) 'vi-state)
> (message "Doomed going in"))
> (setq-local viper-current-state new-state)
> (when (eq (default-value 'viper-current-state) 'vi-state)
> (message "Doomed. viper-current-state is now vi-state"))
>
> The setq-local replaces a simple setq at about line 380. When the
> problem starts I see the "Doomed. Viper-current-state is now
> vi-state", but I do *not* see the "Doomed going in" message. This
> implies that setq-local is setting the default value of the variable
> and that really shouldn't be possible. Either I'm nuts or this is an
> emacs bug.
viper-current-state is defined with make-variable-buffer-local (via
viper-deflocalvar), which makes it an "automatically buffer-local"
variable:
This function marks VARIABLE (a symbol) automatically buffer-local,
so that any subsequent attempt to set it will make it local to the
current buffer at the time. Unlike ‘make-local-variable’, with
which it is often confused, this cannot be undone, and affects the
behavior of the variable in all buffers.
A peculiar wrinkle of this feature is that binding the variable
(with ‘let’ or other binding constructs) does not create a
buffer-local binding for it. Only setting the variable (with ‘set’
or ‘setq’), while the variable does not have a ‘let’-style binding
that was made in the current buffer, does so.
Apparently even an explicit setq-local (make-local-variable) cannot
create a local binding in the situation that the second paragraph talks
about:
(progn
(make-variable-buffer-local 'x)
(let ((x 0))
(setq-local x 1)
(cons (local-variable-p 'x)
(default-value 'x))))
=> (nil . 1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode
2015-05-27 22:28 ` Johan Bockgård
@ 2015-05-28 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-02-10 8:11 ` bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files Lars Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2015-05-28 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Morgan; +Cc: 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
> (progn
> (make-variable-buffer-local 'x)
> (let ((x 0))
> (setq-local x 1)
> (cons (local-variable-p 'x)
> (default-value 'x))))
> => (nil . 1)
I think that's a bug.
setq-local uses make-local-variable and that *should* create
a buffer-local binding, even if the variable is currently let-bound.
The fact that the variable is `make-variable-buffer-local' is no excuse.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files
2015-05-27 22:28 ` Johan Bockgård
2015-05-28 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2022-02-10 8:11 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-02-10 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Morgan, 20521@debbugs.gnu.org
Johan Bockgård <bojohan@gnu.org> writes:
> Apparently even an explicit setq-local (make-local-variable) cannot
> create a local binding in the situation that the second paragraph talks
> about:
>
> (progn
> (make-variable-buffer-local 'x)
> (let ((x 0))
> (setq-local x 1)
> (cons (local-variable-p 'x)
> (default-value 'x))))
> => (nil . 1)
(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
at the time.)
It looks like this has been fixed in the years since it was reported --
this form evaluates to (t) in Emacs 29, so I'm closing this bug report.
If there's more to be done here, please respond to the debbugs address
and we'll reopen.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-10 8:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-06 23:35 bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files Alan Morgan
2015-05-15 20:39 ` bug#20521: Bug 2051 Alan Morgan
2015-05-15 21:08 ` Nick Andryshak
2015-05-15 21:42 ` Drew Adams
2015-05-15 23:24 ` Nick Andryshak
2015-05-15 21:51 ` Alan Morgan
2015-05-27 16:50 ` bug#20521: setq-local definitely behaving oddly for viper mode Alan Morgan
2015-05-27 22:28 ` Johan Bockgård
2015-05-28 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-02-10 8:11 ` bug#20521: Viper version is 3.14.2 of July 4, 2013; After some hours of use I don't enter viper mode automatically on new files Lars Ingebrigtsen
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.