From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31576: emacs-lisp-intro.texi - NAME, TITLE inconsistency among @node, @unnumberedsec Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:47:10 +1000 Message-ID: <0D178B6C-7DD7-48AA-A2C6-504F06EACC8E@scratch.space> References: <83zi0pbwxb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527129965 20580 195.159.176.226 (24 May 2018 02:46:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 02:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31576@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 04:46:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgGO-0005ER-Qz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 04:46:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36226 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgIV-0001S8-Tr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgIP-0001S3-D9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgIM-00083S-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgIM-00083N-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgIM-0005j2-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Van L Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 02:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31576 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31576-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31576.152713004221961 (code B ref 31576); Thu, 24 May 2018 02:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31576) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2018 02:47:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgHg-0005i8-BO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:46063) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLgHe-0005i0-Tp for 31576@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from epi.local (123-243-244-176.tpgi.com.au [123.243.244.176]) (Authenticated sender: van@scratch.space) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EA7D200006; Thu, 24 May 2018 04:47:15 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83zi0pbwxb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146458 Archived-At: > Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 > I see no problem here. I don=E2=80=99t want to nitpick, just registering what looks out of = place with fresh eyes. I=E2=80=99m not looking at how the label fits the = context, if either both adequately capture the context I see no problem = either.