all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: Toon Claes <toon@tonotdo.com>, 11865@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11865: Fwd: Re: 24.1.50; doxygen comments not highlighted in c++-mode
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:03:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C474D0B-86AF-4030-B4B4-87E8CBEC4A67@iotcl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y4a8m9b2.fsf@gnus.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1428 bytes --]

Hi,

I do not really agree.

Let me explain in detail.
Only comment blocks like the following were recognized as gtkdoc:
/**
 * This is the gtkdoc comment
 */

I wanted also gtkdoc styling to be applied to:
/** This should be gtkdoc comment too */

I admit, the regexp I wrote back in the day was not correctly escaped.
But I was trying to achieve comments with 3 or more asterisks would not get styled like gtkdoc comments.


Gr,
Toon


> On 26 Feb 2016, at 04:37, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
> 
> Toon Claes <toon@tonotdo.com> writes:
> 
>> (defconst gtkdoc-font-lock-keywords
>> `((,(lambda (limit)
>> - (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/**$" limit
>> + (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/**([^*/].*)?$" limit
> 
> Can this be correct, though?  It would mean that /** foo / **/ wouldn't
> be a comment...  and anyway, the /** is invalid as a regexp, anyway.
> 
> The current code looks like
> 
> (defconst gtkdoc-font-lock-keywords
>  `((,(lambda (limit)
> 	(c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*$" limit
> 	  gtkdoc-font-lock-doc-comments)
> 	(c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*< " limit
> 	  gtkdoc-font-lock-doc-protection)
> 	))))
> 
> Which looks more correct anyway.  So I think this has already been fixed
> in a different manner, and I'm closing this bug report.
> 
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
>   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 842 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-05 11:46 bug#11865: 24.1.50; doxygen comments not highlighted in c++-mode Toon Claes
2012-07-06 14:00 ` Toon Claes
2012-07-10  6:59   ` Toon Claes
2016-02-24  6:29     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2013-06-05  8:24 ` bug#11865: Fwd: " Toon Claes
2016-02-26  3:37   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-02-26  8:03     ` Toon Claes [this message]
2016-02-27  4:04       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-03-10  8:58         ` Toon Claes
2019-06-27 15:10           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-06-28  9:19             ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-06-30 15:13             ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-07-01  7:49               ` Toon Claes
2019-07-03  2:36                 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2016-02-25  6:01 ` bug#11865: " Anders Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0C474D0B-86AF-4030-B4B4-87E8CBEC4A67@iotcl.com \
    --to=toon@iotcl.com \
    --cc=11865@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=toon@tonotdo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.