From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: VanL Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37079: 26.2.90 feature request; bury-frame command for desktop-wm Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:31:13 +1000 Message-ID: <0C3B5FB5-3E39-4087-9144-F5F6A71D2F10@scratch.space> References: <38CF2C4B-C213-48A3-83C3-66220FB62C9F@scratch.space> <78c56b66-b46b-335e-bd4c-39ae81a21ab3@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="100452"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37079@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 19 11:32:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hze1W-000Px8-UT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:32:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46590 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hze1U-0000O1-KE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:32:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hze1K-0000NA-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hze1G-0006CX-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:32:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hze1C-00069U-Jj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hze1C-0007e5-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: VanL Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37079 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37079-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37079.156620708329335 (code B ref 37079); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2019 09:31:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hze0Z-0007d4-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:31:23 -0400 Original-Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:35221) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hze0X-0007cw-St for 37079@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from epi.local (193-119-112-173.tpgi.com.au [193.119.112.173]) (Authenticated sender: van@scratch.space) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9788200007; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:31:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <78c56b66-b46b-335e-bd4c-39ae81a21ab3@gmx.at> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165376 Archived-At: > On 19 Aug 2019, at 17:38, martin rudalics wrote: >=20 > What should 'bury-frame' do? In which sense would it be different > from 'lower-frame'? How would you return-back-to a buried frame? The two terms are synonymous. I searched for the idea closest to = 'lower-frame' on the web and used 'bury-frame' in this feature request = for the reason that `bury' is what is done to move a buffer to the = `bottom' of a 'listing of buffers'. Use case: I am editing within an Emacs frame. I context switch to = another app and want to lower (or bury) the Emacs frame with a quick = keyboard shortcut. After completing the task at the other app which has = taken my hand to the mouse I want to continue on that lowered Emacs = frame by clicking on that. To bury the frame completely without any = part of it showing for mouse clicking to raise is a corner case I may = not want all of the time. -- v.=