From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:39:27 +0100 Message-ID: <0AF4553B-0BA4-4059-B969-2FCFBDE16F0B@acm.org> References: <4201DF24-BCC4-4C08-9857-38207B7C10B4@acm.org> <83mu8bdriv.fsf@gnu.org> <68FB4EC3-3C67-4D07-8473-5FC671024515@acm.org> <834kuhecsr.fsf@gnu.org> <0C9FA58E-BFD8-4F6D-BAAE-0C9AE03F0286@acm.org> <83wo7dcbl8.fsf@gnu.org> <8193C9CF-41ED-47E6-9F1C-A9A63F113540@acm.org> <54862B96-5653-4BC3-9AA9-37092DCAD7B8@acm.org> <83eetkco9m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="26828"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 22 20:40:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jG6S6-0006sj-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jG6S5-0000y1-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34655) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jG6RZ-0000Xm-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jG6RY-0007Qn-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:39:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail171c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.181]:42786 helo=mail92c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jG6RY-0007P8-3D; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:39:32 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1584905970; bh=oM79XUizdsrORxKSSz3a9HZVMEA4RTbRZ8NFWQv0rYM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=rnHXh9r8GaaXgKaBtH2WSULt3eu0b3AVNxJTEPAagkPI4xxKAJLPJ+WYj9tlT8LNv FWqPY0sAZhGbdTnBFlNLeHPkmryavALlgeqyaUjDeSZvxudCW5TXyMjdmgz2lXD5sZ JLboTo66Ls1buuTAMc1Ddu974YHayKPCmjSEXRYQ= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from stanniol.lan (c-6f4fe655.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [85.230.79.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail92c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 02MJdRYB023839; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:39:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83eetkco9m.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F18.5E77BED1.004F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=aY8fYigt c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=fHaj9vQUQVKQ4sUldAaXuQ==:117 a=fHaj9vQUQVKQ4sUldAaXuQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=41A4JnCa47xbWTwi6uIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=ncZ9vwaUYPMA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 91.136.10.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245696 Archived-At: 22 mars 2020 kl. 18.06 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > If local patching is an issue, perhaps you could rewrite the code as a > module? No, Fregexp_bytecode cannot be written as a module. You have made your point abundantly clear, and the code is not = important. I'm not going to fight.