From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:38:00 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <08c9c555-173f-f147-5f85-fc24b81be01f@cs.ucla.edu> References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7y63sjj.fsf@gnu.org> <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <29a6c120-f260-0ea3-f5e0-1d3dd6323d09@gmx.at> <5752c978-3a13-4e09-18b3-14201eaf1083@gmx.at> <711f2723-3bb7-78f4-c4a3-d4896d248388@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="117748"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 22:38:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLC2P-000UWn-Uz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:38:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLC2P-0007cM-1X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:38:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLC1x-0007DI-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLC1w-0005hZ-27 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:52564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLC1v-0005bk-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0C41600C7; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id vmyzUdQeBRRY; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523C51600CD; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id SyWCz_-7QZbp; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EFC81600C7; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <711f2723-3bb7-78f4-c4a3-d4896d248388@gmx.at> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246493 Archived-At: On 4/5/20 1:46 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > I looked into this, and although it's no doubt fundamentally due to = a > > slow algorithm, the slowness is exacerbated if you use -Og (which yo= u > > appear to be using). >=20 > I'm using '-O0 -g3 -no-pie' for builds that I use to debug issues and > '-O3 -no-pie' for builds that I use for daily work. Ah, my mistake. I thought you were using -Og (some other people were). Oh= well,=20 my patch does help those other people a bit. > It offers me an overclock mode with a CPU frequency of 200 MHz and a > PCIE Frequency of 100.=C2=A0 I also have M2 Boost disabled whatever tha= t > means.=C2=A0 Still no idea whether that means that I have a Black Editi= on. I wouldn't overclock as it decreases reliability enough that it's not wor= th the=20 hassle; my suggestion to overclock was meant more as a joke. Getting a ne= wer=20 computer should be a much better investment of your time/cash. If you can= 't=20 afford one perhaps we could talk offline about the possibilities.