From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 03:05:14 +0200 Message-ID: <088f5ebf-2787-146b-6935-f1798e870858@yandex.ru> References: <87sfulx86y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87zgotos6d.fsf@yahoo.com> <3522e5c4-30e1-8dfb-a0c4-55a38b2b82c9@yandex.ru> <87sfukm8xj.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1822"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 02:07:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Ca4-0000LD-Dm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 02:07:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55170 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Ca3-0002ck-0I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:07:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0CYu-0001w4-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::336] (port=54898 helo=mail-wm1-x336.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0CYs-0002YI-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id o30so156412wms.4 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:06:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sAifM60l9XKJnVPLYQaQKhsvu6YujFDZL34QYcoohtk=; b=ksqth1ghQWZdNHXDxiJjOSg8qxENO+2H19B7h1B3M2hEQ+lcFbAaqIkM21Zfv4KH+Z +X8OhqQnZwlrcxkDMnlYgsEofQgzSJwmek1EL4vuIJ+t2g44MMPBA+cmuRb/gGDgmmQr lWejKZErafV2Pk1F1/qYEG8e8apVemvhYVZmAPi1ZsNXJ8N9tSdOBJt6jS3KlN2gN0zz uWhkj+0JouiJJun/uu5NHtic+HzIHj1fO415SO+0f1g3xLIY28kOUd1VpQ75UjyJ8Zdw lOxGs7I6TYFEJmFw69NZ/nt4Ry2Yiy2yWDPThf+Iz8lQQ+sNzakvGUgzpK7iy9aouDjx wv8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sAifM60l9XKJnVPLYQaQKhsvu6YujFDZL34QYcoohtk=; b=c/OctemozDXYTdvigDJFinkDuq9tfk4APROKPcqB/6SbEFvOMBwhp6Rgk/MJepz2P4 bXlsU0AYZV0KGbWVb+Lxelmr8V5CjLE/B3+GZOT2nOMG/XZXNoqd1YjS49Q/zx+AeZTR eZOuyeMRyrd0Ix+WmoRJzmA5n3TW2Ejat6sttJ19v0csmzxNCt8fwZRgrAv64n/5foGc PLEQ7VQcXj4r+KUKZJPxQYjWOjsjsBNcHVU8obWesiB5IiX6Sbf1v9E4dDjfdeQWRCcY rL+8lvAAMlvrYcfeV4YVNdCJBEb8c+BLbbxnfI+17sGwwCjvxhcJjthlBPSAdM6Wcdfj gY6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531W2KaE6nBJ5iYlJrCkX1OzY7yiSyIb7IgR4Dzr/gmPCxI/Kgep rQDKkzIKONjLiKwKYYApNOBfxUfnzE8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq6SeOlNZNSlcsyIRzIUuFb7LaHWzrrqcb34YFBfjtQn6I9lDTAEuCBHEL11Xy3nZmXJlwBw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d0d:: with SMTP id d13mr189245wmd.78.1640221585350; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:06:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p22sm9251186wms.2.2021.12.22.17.06.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:06:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sfukm8xj.fsf@yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::336 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::336; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x336.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.694, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282855 Archived-At: On 23.12.2021 04:00, Po Lu wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> Very untrue. > At least that was my opinion gained from years of watching people trying > to stay with Emacs 23.4. There is a vast distance between the last version and 23.4 (released a decade ago).