From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Regexp bytecode disassembler Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 17:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <080859bb-9569-48ad-9e75-e6853faa627a@default> References: <4201DF24-BCC4-4C08-9857-38207B7C10B4@acm.org> <83mu8bdriv.fsf@gnu.org> <68FB4EC3-3C67-4D07-8473-5FC671024515@acm.org> <834kuhecsr.fsf@gnu.org> <875zex79bx.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2rtcux2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="73222"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 22 01:03:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFo5F-000IxE-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 01:03:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42048 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFo5E-0000Cq-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFo4k-00084Y-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFo4j-0006Kj-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:51644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFo4h-0006Jy-KA; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02LNtkfN030081; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:02:40 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=n3DTecrEKEFde4D+Xbjzdb3TemQ0rrdwgJn9wUcW6rE=; b=nQzTyK7PuYWBpCxlC9NR54NcZt86u7+/4YDbL2kGPHDtL/TgvhAD9A5bfk1z4iybRtdd ioUPyEOABqOXseNbBSwOW1qcxIOp2yPcuOIuVE7lKQ8oOzy/NZKPpLLC38aqq/o32JRu eL6C6jWwqd6MQXatf2e6j1fZ8tk2kxMAYJrpVIhZ/FysQaybjot09r9xbePOn+QlxD5V XRBft6SSr2AQZ24LFdENrbxsQSKDGKYPWjAv3/kgDbr16y3zlH88ckCD/Um8Z9AtuBxM lz0FMYJj8G2dnKgYsghPuTMTvbygzy0ECVNplsjEVJslmgvEny7gonCqru3TBow3sPyl uA== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ywbjmspk6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:02:40 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02M02eoY072388; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:02:40 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ywvmt9d3m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:02:40 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0015.oracle.com (abhmp0015.oracle.com [141.146.116.21]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 02M02ZW3019165; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:02:35 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4966.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9567 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=751 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003210144 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9567 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=828 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003210143 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.85 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245655 Archived-At: > To me, `pcase' would be overkill here=20 ... because it is more general. Like `cond', it doesn't make clear that this is a simple case that is exactly the case that `cl-case' handles. Yes, the code in this case looks the same, whether it is `pcase' or `cl-case', but the latter does only this, so it's clear that only this is involved.