change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Sam Halliday]

Hi all,

I have a setup with multiple monitors and when using Emacs I have a frame in each monitor.

I recently asked a question on this list and the solution was to set

  (setq-default display-buffer-reuse-frames t)

so that 'next-error would not popup a new window (when the window was already open in a new frame).

That worked great! I've recently been extending my use of basic emacs commands to include the commands under `C-x 5 ...` (i.e. the "do in the other frame" commands)

However, when I type `C-x 5 b` and select a buffer name, I am expecting the buffer to be shown in the other frame. But instead, the buffer is opened in a new frame.

It would appear that setting 'display-buffer-reuse-frames is not enough to force re-use of existing frames and this function is popping up a new one.

Is there something else I must do to re-use frames? I note that display-buffer-reuse-frames is deprecated, but I'm not entirely sure how to migrate to the new world.

Best regards,
Sam

Re: change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Sam Halliday]

I've updated the below with the newer display-buffer-alist approach with

  (setq display-buffer-alist
        '((".*" display-buffer-reuse-window (reusable-frames . t))
          (".*" display-buffer-pop-up-frame (inhibit-switch-frame . t))))

The reuse-window entry seems to reproduce the behaviour of the legacy setting I was using.

I have added a display-buffer-pop-up-frame entry as per the documentation for display-buffer but it seems to be ignored.

Is my syntax perhaps incorrect? Maybe there should only be one ".*"?



On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 15:16:27 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a setup with multiple monitors and when using Emacs I have a frame in each monitor.
> 
> I recently asked a question on this list and the solution was to set
> 
>   (setq-default display-buffer-reuse-frames t)
> 
> so that 'next-error would not popup a new window (when the window was already open in a new frame).
> 
> That worked great! I've recently been extending my use of basic emacs commands to include the commands under `C-x 5 ...` (i.e. the "do in the other frame" commands)
> 
> However, when I type `C-x 5 b` and select a buffer name, I am expecting the buffer to be shown in the other frame. But instead, the buffer is opened in a new frame.
> 
> It would appear that setting 'display-buffer-reuse-frames is not enough to force re-use of existing frames and this function is popping up a new one.
> 
> Is there something else I must do to re-use frames? I note that display-buffer-reuse-frames is deprecated, but I'm not entirely sure how to migrate to the new world.
> 
> Best regards,
> Sam

Re: change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Sam Halliday]

I'm starting to think there must be a bug somewhere. Setting the explicit action is still causing `C-x 5 b` to open a new frame even if one is already open:

  (setq display-buffer--other-frame-action
        '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame)
          (reusable-frames . t) (inhibit-same-window . t)))

I'm on Debian Jessie but some mac users have said that the out-of-the-box behaviour is for `C-x 5 b` to reuse the other frame.

I'm stumped. Any help appreciated.


On Thursday, 28 May 2015 12:22:25 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> I've updated the below with the newer display-buffer-alist approach with
> 
>   (setq display-buffer-alist
>         '((".*" display-buffer-reuse-window (reusable-frames . t))
>           (".*" display-buffer-pop-up-frame (inhibit-switch-frame . t))))
> 
> The reuse-window entry seems to reproduce the behaviour of the legacy setting I was using.
> 
> I have added a display-buffer-pop-up-frame entry as per the documentation for display-buffer but it seems to be ignored.
> 
> Is my syntax perhaps incorrect? Maybe there should only be one ".*"?
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 15:16:27 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have a setup with multiple monitors and when using Emacs I have a frame in each monitor.
> > 
> > I recently asked a question on this list and the solution was to set
> > 
> >   (setq-default display-buffer-reuse-frames t)
> > 
> > so that 'next-error would not popup a new window (when the window was already open in a new frame).
> > 
> > That worked great! I've recently been extending my use of basic emacs commands to include the commands under `C-x 5 ...` (i.e. the "do in the other frame" commands)
> > 
> > However, when I type `C-x 5 b` and select a buffer name, I am expecting the buffer to be shown in the other frame. But instead, the buffer is opened in a new frame.
> > 
> > It would appear that setting 'display-buffer-reuse-frames is not enough to force re-use of existing frames and this function is popping up a new one.
> > 
> > Is there something else I must do to re-use frames? I note that display-buffer-reuse-frames is deprecated, but I'm not entirely sure how to migrate to the new world.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Sam

Re: change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Sam Halliday]

I'm starting to think that `C-x 5` commands are not really intended to reuse the other frame (despite their name). From the docs http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Creating-Frames.html

> If an existing visible or iconified ("minimized") frame already displays the requested buffer, that frame is raised and deiconified ("un-minimized"); otherwise, a new frame is created on the current display terminal.


e.g. starting emacs24 (debian jessie) with -Q and type

  C-x 5 2 ;; new frame
  C-x 5 b ;; *Messages*

a THIRD frame is opened. I had expected the other frame to be reused.


Is there any way to get the `C-x 5` commands to reuse the other frame instead of creating a new one or am I going to have to rewrite my own functions that first call `other-frame`?



On Thursday, 28 May 2015 15:02:45 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> I'm starting to think there must be a bug somewhere. Setting the explicit action is still causing `C-x 5 b` to open a new frame even if one is already open:
> 
>   (setq display-buffer--other-frame-action
>         '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame)
>           (reusable-frames . t) (inhibit-same-window . t)))
> 
> I'm on Debian Jessie but some mac users have said that the out-of-the-box behaviour is for `C-x 5 b` to reuse the other frame.
> 
> I'm stumped. Any help appreciated.
> 
> 
> On Thursday, 28 May 2015 12:22:25 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> > I've updated the below with the newer display-buffer-alist approach with
> > 
> >   (setq display-buffer-alist
> >         '((".*" display-buffer-reuse-window (reusable-frames . t))
> >           (".*" display-buffer-pop-up-frame (inhibit-switch-frame . t))))
> > 
> > The reuse-window entry seems to reproduce the behaviour of the legacy setting I was using.
> > 
> > I have added a display-buffer-pop-up-frame entry as per the documentation for display-buffer but it seems to be ignored.
> > 
> > Is my syntax perhaps incorrect? Maybe there should only be one ".*"?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 15:16:27 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I have a setup with multiple monitors and when using Emacs I have a frame in each monitor.
> > > 
> > > I recently asked a question on this list and the solution was to set
> > > 
> > >   (setq-default display-buffer-reuse-frames t)
> > > 
> > > so that 'next-error would not popup a new window (when the window was already open in a new frame).
> > > 
> > > That worked great! I've recently been extending my use of basic emacs commands to include the commands under `C-x 5 ...` (i.e. the "do in the other frame" commands)
> > > 
> > > However, when I type `C-x 5 b` and select a buffer name, I am expecting the buffer to be shown in the other frame. But instead, the buffer is opened in a new frame.
> > > 
> > > It would appear that setting 'display-buffer-reuse-frames is not enough to force re-use of existing frames and this function is popping up a new one.
> > > 
> > > Is there something else I must do to re-use frames? I note that display-buffer-reuse-frames is deprecated, but I'm not entirely sure how to migrate to the new world.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Sam

Re: change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Michael Heerdegen]

Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com> writes:

>   (setq display-buffer--other-frame-action
>         '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame)
>           (reusable-frames . t) (inhibit-same-window . t)))

That makes the thing reuse a frame only when there is a window already
displaying the buffer - see doc of `display-buffer-reuse-window'.

This is seemingly not what you want.  What do you want instead: that a
random window in a random frame is selected and forced to display the
buffer?


Michael.

Re: change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Sam Halliday]

Workaround incase anybody else comes across this

(defun switch-to-buffer-other-frame--no-really (buffer-or-name)
  "Switch to buffer BUFFER-OR-NAME in the other frame."
  (interactive
   (list (read-buffer-to-switch "Switch to buffer in other frame: ")))
  (other-frame 1)
  (switch-to-buffer buffer-or-name nil t)
  (other-frame -1))

(global-set-key (kbd "C-x 5 b") 'switch-to-buffer-other-frame--no-really)



On Thursday, 28 May 2015 15:16:42 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> I'm starting to think that `C-x 5` commands are not really intended to reuse the other frame (despite their name). From the docs http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Creating-Frames.html
> 
> > If an existing visible or iconified ("minimized") frame already displays the requested buffer, that frame is raised and deiconified ("un-minimized"); otherwise, a new frame is created on the current display terminal.
> 
> 
> e.g. starting emacs24 (debian jessie) with -Q and type
> 
>   C-x 5 2 ;; new frame
>   C-x 5 b ;; *Messages*
> 
> a THIRD frame is opened. I had expected the other frame to be reused.
> 
> 
> Is there any way to get the `C-x 5` commands to reuse the other frame instead of creating a new one or am I going to have to rewrite my own functions that first call `other-frame`?
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday, 28 May 2015 15:02:45 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> > I'm starting to think there must be a bug somewhere. Setting the explicit action is still causing `C-x 5 b` to open a new frame even if one is already open:
> > 
> >   (setq display-buffer--other-frame-action
> >         '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame)
> >           (reusable-frames . t) (inhibit-same-window . t)))
> > 
> > I'm on Debian Jessie but some mac users have said that the out-of-the-box behaviour is for `C-x 5 b` to reuse the other frame.
> > 
> > I'm stumped. Any help appreciated.
> > 
> > 
> > On Thursday, 28 May 2015 12:22:25 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> > > I've updated the below with the newer display-buffer-alist approach with
> > > 
> > >   (setq display-buffer-alist
> > >         '((".*" display-buffer-reuse-window (reusable-frames . t))
> > >           (".*" display-buffer-pop-up-frame (inhibit-switch-frame . t))))
> > > 
> > > The reuse-window entry seems to reproduce the behaviour of the legacy setting I was using.
> > > 
> > > I have added a display-buffer-pop-up-frame entry as per the documentation for display-buffer but it seems to be ignored.
> > > 
> > > Is my syntax perhaps incorrect? Maybe there should only be one ".*"?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 15:16:27 UTC+1, Sam Halliday  wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > I have a setup with multiple monitors and when using Emacs I have a frame in each monitor.
> > > > 
> > > > I recently asked a question on this list and the solution was to set
> > > > 
> > > >   (setq-default display-buffer-reuse-frames t)
> > > > 
> > > > so that 'next-error would not popup a new window (when the window was already open in a new frame).
> > > > 
> > > > That worked great! I've recently been extending my use of basic emacs commands to include the commands under `C-x 5 ...` (i.e. the "do in the other frame" commands)
> > > > 
> > > > However, when I type `C-x 5 b` and select a buffer name, I am expecting the buffer to be shown in the other frame. But instead, the buffer is opened in a new frame.
> > > > 
> > > > It would appear that setting 'display-buffer-reuse-frames is not enough to force re-use of existing frames and this function is popping up a new one.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there something else I must do to re-use frames? I note that display-buffer-reuse-frames is deprecated, but I'm not entirely sure how to migrate to the new world.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Sam

Re: change buffer in other frame, multiple monitors

[Yuri Khan]

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Michael Heerdegen
<michael_heerdegen@web.de> wrote:

> What do you want instead: that a
> random window in a random frame is selected and forced to display the
> buffer?

I think the implicit assumption is that there exists a unique frame
other than the current one, and that it contains a single window.

I find myself in such a setup quite often, although my normal workflow
is then to switch to the other frame (using windmove + framemove) and
then select whatever buffer I need in that frame.