From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: visual-line-mode Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:25:31 +0200 Message-ID: <0557C1F9-4245-4894-8B73-5B1F30E304E7@gmail.com> References: <87zlp4raab.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <3CF14102-968E-4B46-898D-4ACF3B7DD380@gmail.com> <41C9233D-35DB-49B5-80B8-DEBE43C82E05@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214814353 27895 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2008 08:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , Emacs-Devel devel To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 30 10:26:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDEic-000592-J8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:26:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48830 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDEhm-000356-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDEhf-00032y-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDEhd-0002zh-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55477 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDEhc-0002zd-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:40421) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KDEhb-0006Fs-Jf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id l31so219309ugc.48 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:25:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=PnDkKba1hf9/F3sKURsQH0M51a62vZzWc+qwJJlFcuo=; b=MG/NP5ga8JbMuAN7ECrINYpW6QaywPXb87zyt+n57izS913GyHFITpTVUQOPtv9xVe sIr9k9Z9xDHm0hinuTnbJf7kL+MmSWHV03iugKBcYJwy/Q8bhyuk4g3qOClVh3dt11T4 coG8IyBPpWQYLVbkc7dSAuyYClOy069q7EZOg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=VKK3UW+2t8bb5AV1mgxOw3ZkV4j4YRu7S5oKDCne2J6E8U2ee4zzdW4+LVSsa67ihP koKAxqg2QrSg5wsBcyUMqhS0sE7t8agLNx4VfgpGfmmaYilSs422nEPbDnPt134SEDan zWyj3awM97uTNORI0joZwuxJ53dAyu592nkvM= Original-Received: by 10.67.115.12 with SMTP id s12mr3618973ugm.51.1214814334127; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.178.26? ( [87.183.53.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e23sm813869ugd.47.2008.06.30.01.25.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:25:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100203 Archived-At: On 30 Jun 2008, at 10:05, Miles Bader wrote: > > FWIW, Stefan's patch seems to work a bit better (functionally), and > feels much faster. It apparently uses a new feature of > `vertical-motion'. The (COLS . LINES) specification? Does it work with variable-width fonts? Most of the time in my algorithm is spent on figuring out where to go in text set in variable-width fonts.