Which is better to navigate source code?

Which is better to navigate source code?

[Water Lin]

I have a lot of code which I need to check under Linux. So I think use
Emacs my code brower is a good choice.

But when I am using ECB, it seems that ECB can't get some tags for my
functions, class. What should I do to get some tags for my code?

I checked EmacsWiki and it says that we have etags (which comes with
emacs), and ExuberantCtags which can generate tags file. And it says
that ExuberantCtags is the best choice as it supports more languages and
is more robust.

So I think I need to use ECB together with ExuberantCtags, is it right?

What's your tools?

Thanks

Water Lin

-- 
Water Lin's notes and pencils: http://en.waterlin.org
Email: WaterLin@ymail.com

Re: Which is better to navigate source code?

[want.to.be.professer]

On 12月3日, 上午10时53分, Water Lin <Water...@ymail.invalid> wrote:
> I have a lot of code which I need to check under Linux. So I think use
> Emacs my code brower is a good choice.
>
> But when I am using ECB, it seems that ECB can't get some tags for my
> functions, class. What should I do to get some tags for my code?
>
> I checked EmacsWiki and it says that we have etags (which comes with
> emacs), and ExuberantCtags which can generate tags file. And it says
> that ExuberantCtags is the best choice as it supports more languages and
> is more robust.
>
> So I think I need to use ECB together with ExuberantCtags, is it right?
>
> What's your tools?
>
> Thanks
>
> Water Lin
>
> --
> Water Lin's notes and pencils:http://en.waterlin.org
> Email: Water...@ymail.com


for C++'s 'class', CSCOPE is better than etags. ebrowse is also good.