From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: String interpolation Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:29:03 -0500 Message-ID: <03666120-1c7e-f0b2-6812-62e59a951854@gmail.com> References: <51825111-ace4-f750-4077-026a3b648d27@gmail.com> <8737hwnc52.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8c117f5c-209a-97d8-79ce-a78f707f0545@gmail.com> <76c9c475-0180-aa49-3d4a-006d4e3f943c@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f0AJ1rPoD50DrkhpBoGjxlL9Sv74wi1Dg" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481473785 30365 195.159.176.226 (11 Dec 2016 16:29:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 17:29:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cG70O-0006yt-Qg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:29:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56205 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG70T-0004XO-2c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:29:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG70L-0004WC-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:29:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG70I-0004Bf-OP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:29:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]:49677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG70I-00042M-FN; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:29:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.111.108.29] ([18.111.108.29]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEVGT-1cQmFT3dqT-00FiAx; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:29:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:q+zLg9B0nMvPlfgOSf5KAJzWbHVFVMpRwZ3mqioo5gLhepQI+Nr dJ+/DuU47SsW0NNrAJJagZmvyFi1vjUQoDN9xRNRtHtW45fbz3Ptel69W5TcCfHrhWRasvO XxJIGWHI/wAUxoP7+PsmgNDvwwMvUPZBDHV6Iq514cgtQiPYlI7nPHbPPBCpf9dHe2dXROE 8HEhWxh911QrVZr0tr9TQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6We+eSHvNbU=:eFxoAj93YCyQmptauaohoI s0GjxVJqE9Bs428IorrA65IcxAIbotelVd/aUhq99ydCI6yIkEfOqq8rmI4vHV5xQliGomiQ5 FvvLRkJ2Dwy62F0gOGisOdaq1YI9zkt0EFWw9AxN67vi2+hCv9dc7PSB9WaM8o1xk4XNhPDSh f4Y9qegBN6vhoCxMwGsKPUIPOFjR9+O33jBW1sVpP6d+xCNi2ZW5zsvdocJJ602SYN9xyQoH9 aGpoKF4+4noyvSwKhKhlSAzuAi2BgLt5kfYrT6kq88OvYo3aWpEh2jjs11CdLnrTxnr4Z7h6l bUc3VofX7sR08nv+wqX+w4/1oA4F4v3QhrTHkoVae+8RxeRpStQgPgIlR0LJ7jJYvMk9zGvyL CTZ4cPc3lVFjGa3NN9lN7CxOfX+psYq/R4k1CprM4kI2Md+0iUpRrEggyOif7e9ObHjBFMu6D hpnDP/fv57NULhjVGP2LOGSuyCfEdNY3QwT+j5Ssv1GcDkngK27i9Z1G736Lob4b0NGC7YVI5 S11qjBBo8G7nq3c8wZxyHmmOjHOw7HqdhgH7dV7y2U67qJPkT6sjxUr7vP2ubjCy5S3YozgWw 9UIBN74hZ3Zav4k3EwoOdBWIH0fiyb5tsrkUaX/78efAQSW7X42Awn3DTQLu1Dkvnbj691eAt hEtkwBnao2rC0whZ8lhqpjApS3gC+TSA7S4JXRUwCJnK6lzi9ngbpHkOe4zsysGWHESM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.73 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210283 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --f0AJ1rPoD50DrkhpBoGjxlL9Sv74wi1Dg Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bsnhJA0kB0rOG97BOGI2HEwBRbN2dEHKJ"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: rms@gnu.org Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <03666120-1c7e-f0b2-6812-62e59a951854@gmail.com> Subject: Re: RFC: String interpolation References: <51825111-ace4-f750-4077-026a3b648d27@gmail.com> <8737hwnc52.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8c117f5c-209a-97d8-79ce-a78f707f0545@gmail.com> <76c9c475-0180-aa49-3d4a-006d4e3f943c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: --bsnhJA0kB0rOG97BOGI2HEwBRbN2dEHKJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-12-11 04:35, Richard Stallman wrote: > Is there a reason why people are writing (funcall '+ 3.42423 4) > rather than (+ 3.42423 4)? I wondered too :) But Lars' examples were written that way, so I did the = same to ease comparison. Cl=C3=A9ment. --bsnhJA0kB0rOG97BOGI2HEwBRbN2dEHKJ-- --f0AJ1rPoD50DrkhpBoGjxlL9Sv74wi1Dg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYTX7TAAoJEPqg+cTm90wj4HYP/1ahY/xtQ4OrukUL0cjmvXU/ XHXEcvH6W79qmCXEsXEEfp53RXHybD6HYqSr3DyoelnKpPVFYbPb07QrTZdfPdGM reWTCf5dmi1kgs9p4U6Z3RSSuz+lpclXl5iXr94de4S+2ic5/jqYlN3fXIUCkHRa fSQopyqIkMvrHKA+zs1vaLaZGlpf/pg1Ya3i4eY4dSKPt7i+h8tCzx7UJMYlRSwZ bAd9+bCprIU7ujRj5v5FCrPO7x5mSkYIjndVDX6uzIX6+Vko92i1lLXG4ypQCMuV pIi/7FLpEg8WRBww2pio3Wykj2E3rz+cdeEB+qWWRfn14HecIznQe0XsBt8HTAbZ fRVT72eOM2QbI0bssXVPFmQlnd17bvwYKsoKx0ee6Ub/Y2urw+L8dkEqRjIkNWbI Ia+Q2q8hM2jnU7cLX4JUWQvORlEdy0rwLfCgMaDb8N6OOCYyKDfnSpWoDwOClip1 9chpIfjCK5ZUuI+1Ac3OWuTdXsNjy15UAT4mpAyvME0amDABTYLPzvUNEyD2cL+U bFY77jdoO/T2Sd1kcHnPtzUsDdKWiIMRyoV4KSckXUAVcjpP3SZ4B5UWNB3vK9Sv N4M3+rQKwWNslj2SiV+c7LYR3nasswi5H5X/Ulk8tChaJzSIuSkC6ueJNCr2VmJo REZ4xABt+DbOAETmugeY =KToa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f0AJ1rPoD50DrkhpBoGjxlL9Sv74wi1Dg--