From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: 21594@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21594: 25.0.50; (elisp): node `Variable Definitions' is not reachable by `i variable definition'
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:07:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02aef894-7fda-4061-943e-24115490c85e@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <<83k1bwhepu.fsf@gnu.org>>
> A node's name is a label, and needs to satisfy
> several requirements, so it isn't always as
> accurate as the section name.
True enough. And one of those requirements is
to be able to use `g' to get to it. A node's
name is something that users see and use. It's
not just an internal label.
> the assumption that someone might look up this
> node by its name, or be surprised that only
> defcustoms are described there, is misguided, IMO.
No one made such an assumption, if by "look up"
you mean only `i'.
The node name is important, and in this case
it's not good.
Use `i' and you get to the right node for
`variable definition'. No problem there.
Use `g' with completion and you get to the
wrong node for the same input.
And you might use substring or multiple-pattern
completion, with input like `var' and `def',
and the result of completion will be `Variable
Definitions', which you will naturally think
takes you to a node about that.
Completion shows you all matches for your input.
Scanning the candidates quickly is another way
to get to a node. It's not about `g' instead
of `i'. It's that `g' is also useful, and node
names should be helpful, not misleading.
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<ae6720ed-ad9d-4110-9213-c8abdafa81e6@default>
[not found] ` <<87v9vgg0vv.fsf@mouse.gnus.org>
[not found] ` <<83k1bwhepu.fsf@gnu.org>
2019-08-01 20:07 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2019-08-02 6:46 ` bug#21594: 25.0.50; (elisp): node `Variable Definitions' is not reachable by `i variable definition' Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-02 11:25 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
[not found] <<<ae6720ed-ad9d-4110-9213-c8abdafa81e6@default>
[not found] ` <<<87v9vgg0vv.fsf@mouse.gnus.org>
[not found] ` <<<83k1bwhepu.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <<02aef894-7fda-4061-943e-24115490c85e@default>
[not found] ` <<83d0hogj3i.fsf@gnu.org>
2019-08-02 15:21 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-30 21:46 Drew Adams
2019-08-01 19:07 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-08-01 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-01 19:57 ` Drew Adams
2019-08-03 2:19 ` Richard Stallman
2019-08-03 4:45 ` Drew Adams
2019-08-04 2:58 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02aef894-7fda-4061-943e-24115490c85e@default \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=21594@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.