all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
@ 2021-03-16 10:18 Jean Louis
  2021-03-18  3:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jean Louis @ 2021-03-16 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

I am fine that M-o is re-configured for some other functions, but not
fine that M-o does not work in enriched mode. It should work as usual
in the enriched mode, or different key bindings with same face setting
functions shall be available in the enriched mode.

Jean



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-16 10:18 M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual Jean Louis
@ 2021-03-18  3:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  2021-03-18 13:21   ` Jean Louis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2021-03-18  3:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:

> I am fine that M-o is re-configured for some other functions, but not
> fine that M-o does not work in enriched mode. It should work as usual
> in the enriched mode, or different key bindings with same face setting
> functions shall be available in the enriched mode.

facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode
where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal.
Sticking it under `C-c C-<letter>' might be better.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-18  3:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2021-03-18 13:21   ` Jean Louis
  2021-03-18 13:40     ` Stefan Kangas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jean Louis @ 2021-03-18 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: emacs-devel

* Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> [2021-03-18 06:46]:
> Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> 
> > I am fine that M-o is re-configured for some other functions, but not
> > fine that M-o does not work in enriched mode. It should work as usual
> > in the enriched mode, or different key bindings with same face setting
> > functions shall be available in the enriched mode.
> 
> facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode
> where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal.
> Sticking it under `C-c C-<letter>' might be better.

Sounds complicated.

I am fine if manual gives instructions to users to bind the function
by user how they wish and want.

But I don't know how to make it back myself to my user key. How do I
do it? Restoring is showin in the temporarily help screen, but that
does not help if I wish to bind it to a key in enriched mode, I don't
know what is the function name to bind. Help me.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-18 13:21   ` Jean Louis
@ 2021-03-18 13:40     ` Stefan Kangas
  2021-03-18 14:55       ` Stefan Monnier
  2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2021-03-18 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Louis, Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: emacs-devel

Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:

>> facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode
>> where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal.
>> Sticking it under `C-c C-<letter>' might be better.
>
> Sounds complicated.

Why is it more complicated than any other mode that puts bindings under
C-c C-<letter>?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-18 13:40     ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2021-03-18 14:55       ` Stefan Monnier
  2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2021-03-18 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, Jean Louis, emacs-devel

>>> facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode
>>> where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal.
>>> Sticking it under `C-c C-<letter>' might be better.
>> Sounds complicated.
> Why is it more complicated than any other mode that puts bindings under
> C-c C-<letter>?

I guess part of the complication is that enriched-mode is a *minor* mode.


        Stefan




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-18 13:40     ` Stefan Kangas
  2021-03-18 14:55       ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
  2021-03-19  7:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
                           ` (2 more replies)
  1 sibling, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jean Louis @ 2021-03-19  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, emacs-devel

Content-Type: text/enriched
Text-Width: 70

* Stefan Kangas <<stefankangas@gmail.com> [2021-03-18 16:40]:
> Jean Louis <<bugs@gnu.support> writes:

> 

> >> facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode
> >> where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal.
> >> Sticking it under `C-c C-<<letter>' might be better.

> >

> > Sounds complicated.

> 

> Why is it more complicated than any other mode that puts bindings under
> C-c C-<<letter>?


Too many key strokes.


Compare it:

- M-o b     -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.


- C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes


And I was thinking C-c will be reserverd for users.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
@ 2021-03-19  7:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
  2021-03-19  8:25         ` Gregory Heytings
  2021-03-19 16:23         ` Stefan Kangas
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2021-03-19  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Louis; +Cc: larsi, stefankangas, emacs-devel

> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:06:14 +0300
> From: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> And I was thinking C-c will be reserverd for users.

Only when followed by a letter.  And "C-o b" is not a letter.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
  2021-03-19  7:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2021-03-19  8:25         ` Gregory Heytings
  2021-03-19 16:23         ` Stefan Kangas
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Heytings @ 2021-03-19  8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Louis; +Cc: emacs-devel


>> Why is it more complicated than any other mode that puts bindings under 
>> C-c C-<letter>?
>
> Too many key strokes.
>

How is "C-c C-b" longer than "M-o b"?  I'd even say it's easier to type.

>
> And I was thinking C-c will be reserverd for users.
>

No: C-c LETTER is reserved for users, C-c C-LETTER for major modes, and 
C-c SYMBOL for minor modes.  (The rules are in fact a bit more detailed, 
but that's the idea.)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
  2021-03-19  7:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
  2021-03-19  8:25         ` Gregory Heytings
@ 2021-03-19 16:23         ` Stefan Kangas
  2021-03-19 16:44           ` Stefan Monnier
  2021-03-20  6:33           ` Jean Louis
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2021-03-19 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Louis; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, emacs-devel

Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:

> - M-o b     -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.
>
> - C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes

Why not `C-c C-b'?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-19 16:23         ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2021-03-19 16:44           ` Stefan Monnier
  2021-03-19 16:57             ` Eli Zaretskii
  2021-03-20  6:33           ` Jean Louis
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2021-03-19 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, Jean Louis, emacs-devel

>> - M-o b     -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.
>> - C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes
> Why not `C-c C-b'?

These are all supposed to be reserved for major modes, so I don't think
they should be used for `enriched-mode`.
Or at least not in its current form (maybe it would make sense to make
a major-mode for it; I wouldn't know: I never use it).


        Stefan




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-19 16:44           ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2021-03-19 16:57             ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2021-03-19 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: larsi, stefan, bugs, emacs-devel

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:44:58 -0400
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> >> - M-o b     -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.
> >> - C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes
> > Why not `C-c C-b'?
> 
> These are all supposed to be reserved for major modes, so I don't think
> they should be used for `enriched-mode`.
> Or at least not in its current form (maybe it would make sense to make
> a major-mode for it; I wouldn't know: I never use it).

Why not do this in Text mode?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
  2021-03-19 16:23         ` Stefan Kangas
  2021-03-19 16:44           ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2021-03-20  6:33           ` Jean Louis
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jean Louis @ 2021-03-20  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, emacs-devel

* Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> [2021-03-19 19:24]:
> Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> 
> > - M-o b     -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.
> >
> > - C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes
> 
> Why not `C-c C-b'?

That is more troublesome as it means there would be no prefix, but
many keys for enriched mode.

M-o i -- for italic is handy
M-o b -- for bold is handy

but C-c C-b -- would be for bold, then C-c C-i for italic?

Doesn't that occupies so many keys? It is not necessary.

Using prefix key for enriched mode is more useful and easier to remember.

Jean




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-20  6:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-16 10:18 M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual Jean Louis
2021-03-18  3:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-18 13:21   ` Jean Louis
2021-03-18 13:40     ` Stefan Kangas
2021-03-18 14:55       ` Stefan Monnier
2021-03-19  7:06       ` Jean Louis
2021-03-19  7:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-19  8:25         ` Gregory Heytings
2021-03-19 16:23         ` Stefan Kangas
2021-03-19 16:44           ` Stefan Monnier
2021-03-19 16:57             ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-20  6:33           ` Jean Louis

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.