From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: face colors on 256 colors terminals Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:58:36 +0300 Message-ID: <01c53b26$Blat.v2.4$3880fa60@zahav.net.il> References: <200504060817.j368HDAH019106@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <01c53acd$Blat.v2.4$7c0f2080@zahav.net.il> <200504061752.j36HqSAH012245@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <01c53aea$Blat.v2.4$16ee4740@zahav.net.il> <200504062350.j36NoAAH028834@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112847180 16633 80.91.229.2 (7 Apr 2005 04:13:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 06:12:58 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJONp-0005zT-Jz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:12:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJNx3-0002Z4-Md for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJNw4-0002HX-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJNw2-0002EL-B8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJOFA-0007Nt-C9; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-67-97.inter.net.il [80.230.67.97]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id ECE53116 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:03:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:22:26 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35676 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35676 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:22:26 +0200 > > > I checked and I could not see any difference in behavior compared to the > > approach in my first patch. > > > > Is this OK? > > I am certain I am missing the context, but is this really related to > the #RRGGBB notation in any manner? It really looks awful to me if > white gets defined as #ff00ff00ff00, so I'd like to be as bothersome > as to be grateful for some factual reassurance that we are indeed > catering here for a real instead of a perceived problem, and that the > fix in that manner is the right thing to do. I'll let Dan answer that.