From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: face colors on 256 colors terminals
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:55:19 +0300
Message-ID: <01c53b25$Blat.v2.4$c2e8e9c0@zahav.net.il>
References: <200504060817.j368HDAH019106@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
	<01c53acd$Blat.v2.4$7c0f2080@zahav.net.il>
	<200504061752.j36HqSAH012245@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
	<01c53aea$Blat.v2.4$16ee4740@zahav.net.il>
	<200504062350.j36NoAAH028834@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112847227 16731 80.91.229.2 (7 Apr 2005 04:13:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:13:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 06:13:45 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJOOR-00062S-RF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:13:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJNxb-0002rK-Pn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:45:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJNwC-0002LA-AU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:44:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJNwB-0002EL-FC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:44:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJOC6-0007IL-Hu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:38 -0400
Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-67-97.inter.net.il [80.230.67.97])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id ECE52828 (AUTH halo1);
	Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:59:55 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4
In-reply-to: <200504062350.j36NoAAH028834@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> (message from
	Dan Nicolaescu on Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:50:07 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35677
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35677

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:50:07 -0700
> 
> I checked and I could not see any difference in behavior compared to the
> approach in my first patch.
> 
> Is this OK? 

Fine with me, but please respond to David's concerns.