From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 28, Issue 119
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:23:14 +0200
Message-ID: <01c5349d$Blat.v2.4$47af2e60@zahav.net.il>
References: <E1DGMY4-0004QH-AC@monty-python.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112128307 6523 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2005 20:31:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Glenn Morris <gmorris@ast.cam.ac.uk>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 22:31:45 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DGNN7-0005SL-HB
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:31:33 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DGNdT-00070m-Lv
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:48:27 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DGNbO-0006IQ-9J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:46:21 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DGNbH-0006El-4d
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:46:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGNbG-0006Cu-QT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:46:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DGNIL-0000bZ-Oq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:26:38 -0500
Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-68-88.inter.net.il [80.230.68.88])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id AWC22960 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:26:35 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4
In-reply-to: <E1DGMY4-0004QH-AC@monty-python.gnu.org>
	(emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35326
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35326

> From: emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:38:49 -0500
> 
> + @kindex C-M-n @r{(Fortran mode)}
>   @kindex C-M-n @r{(F90 mode)}

Why do we need two kindex entries here?  Isn't the one that says
"Fortran mode" enough to cover both Fortran 90 and pre-9x Fortrans?

(Having almost identical index entries pointing to the same place is
BAD.)

> + @kindex C-M-p @r{(Fortran mode)}
>   @kindex C-M-p @r{(F90 mode)}

Same here.