From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Advanced calendar usage in emacs-xtra.texi Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:06:22 +0200 Message-ID: <01c53250$Blat.v2.4$30e343a0@zahav.net.il> References: <01c53236$Blat.v2.4$287360c0@zahav.net.il> <200503262000.j2QK0gx16946@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111875133 9508 80.91.229.6 (26 Mar 2005 22:12:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gmorris@ast.cam.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 26 23:12:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DFJVm-0008Ds-00 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:12:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFJlX-0005ae-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:28:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFJl7-0005Xq-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:27:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFJkz-0005TZ-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:27:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFJkz-0005TB-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFJTy-0002G2-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:10:14 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-9-205.inter.net.il [80.230.9.205]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EAF46049 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:10:01 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <200503262000.j2QK0gx16946@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:00:42 -0600 (CST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35207 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35207 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:00:42 -0600 (CST) > From: Luc Teirlinck > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, gmorris@ast.cam.ac.uk > > However, last time when I proposed something similar (for url.texi, if > I remember well), you and Karl and Dave opposed me on this and I wound > up using a regular @xref. Did you change your mind on this or is > there a fundamental difference between emacs-xtra and url.texi? Well, I didn't suggest @inforef as the first choice this time either, did I? I still think @ifinfo is a better choice. One fundamental difference between emacs-xtra and url is that the former holds material that was deliberately excluded from the Emacs manual. OTOH, url is the documentation of a package.