From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fileio.c "#if 0" block Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 06:52:13 +0200 Message-ID: <01c52208$Blat.v2.4$68b37000@zahav.net.il> References: <01c521a7$Blat.v2.4$bf474060@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110085401 9314 80.91.229.2 (6 Mar 2005 05:03:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 05:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 06 06:03:21 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7nv8-0006KQ-T8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 06:03:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7oEd-0003Fg-Rg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:23:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D7oDM-0002j1-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:22:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D7oDA-0002d7-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:21:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7oD9-0002Yg-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7nmp-0004sD-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (tony05-67-156.inter.net.il [80.230.67.156]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id ARD95042 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 6 Mar 2005 06:54:10 +0200 (IST) Original-To: ttn@glug.org X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (message from Thien-Thi Nguyen on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:25:11 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34238 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34238 > From: Thien-Thi Nguyen > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:25:11 +0100 > > as part of the emacs under vms effort, i'm addressing some of the > "subtle bugs" (that are related to vms) in Fexpand_file_name, by > studying the current behavior, forming a mental model of the correct > behavior and making the necessary changes. for completeness, i would > prefer to apply these bugfixes to all instances of the bug that i can > find, whether in one function or in many. There's no need to change anything inside the ifdef'ed code, IMHO: it's there only to present the original design of Fexpand_file_name, which is quite hard to glean from the current convoluted code.