From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Face color changes
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:31:36 +0200
Message-ID: <01c4ed1c$Blat.v2.2.2$63720320@zahav.net.il>
References: <87fz1srfmt.fsf@jurta.org> <E1Cj9QR-0004rB-VT@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104266213 16550 80.91.229.6 (28 Dec 2004 20:36:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:36:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 21:36:42 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CjO5C-0006MC-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:36:42 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CjOG3-0004sQ-QG
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:47:55 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CjOFa-0004ru-Eh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:47:26 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CjOFY-0004qy-Ht
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:47:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjOFY-0004qX-Ag
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:47:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CjO1u-0006UQ-MM; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:33:18 -0500
Original-Received: from zaretski (tony06-81-83.inter.net.il [80.230.81.83])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id DKK30848 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:33:15 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to: <E1Cj9QR-0004rB-VT@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:57:39 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31540
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31540

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:57:39 -0500
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
>     It suggests to replace "rosybrown" by "plum4" or "PaleVioletRed4", and
> 
> Does anyone want to argue that this change would make things worse?
> Does anyone want to argue for one or the other of those two choices?
> 
>     "orchid" (for font-lock-builtin-face) by "MediumOrchid3" or "DarkOrchid3".
> 
> Same two questions here.

I don't object to any of these changes, provided that they are done
for `(min-colors 88)' and `(min-colors 16)' branches.  The 8-color
terminals should be left alone, IMHO (they define different colors
anyway).