From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-pretest-bug (Was: [bug] line move and truncation) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:53:01 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4cc61$Blat.v2.2.2$765b3780@zahav.net.il> References: <4199C0B8.40408@math.ku.dk> <419A09C9.3060308@math.ku.dk> <87hdnp22eb.fsf_-_@jurta.org> <01c4cc20$Blat.v2.2.2$3e85ea80@zahav.net.il> <20041116231201.GA23221@fencepost> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100667397 10038 80.91.229.6 (17 Nov 2004 04:56:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 05:56:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUHrq-0008La-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:56:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUI0c-000874-Jy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:05:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUI0U-000853-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:05:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUI0T-00084V-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:05:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUI0T-00084M-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:05:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUHrE-0006Kg-WC; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:55:53 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.147.231]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DCW48645 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:55:18 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Miles Bader X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <20041116231201.GA23221@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:12:01 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29956 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29956 > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:12:01 -0500 > Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Miles Bader > > This seems like a rather bizarre justification.... What's bizarre about it? > surely the _vast_ majority of people who read emacs-devel are > interested in fixing bugs. Any statistics on that? Like, e.g., a comparison of the list of subscribers to emacs-devel against the list of people whose names appear in ChangeLog files?