From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DJGPP only dumps with USE_LISP_UNION_TYPE ?? Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4c515$Blat.v2.2.2$c0d6bc60@zahav.net.il> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099865439 25954 80.91.229.6 (7 Nov 2004 22:10:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 07 23:10:34 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQvF3-0003f9-00 for ; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:10:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQvNN-0006D3-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:19:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CQvN4-00068B-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CQvN1-00066X-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:18:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQvN1-000664-IX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:18:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CQvDd-00080X-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:09:05 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (pns03-197-96.inter.net.il [80.230.197.96]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id DAX74749 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 8 Nov 2004 00:08:59 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Jan D." X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29537 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29537 > From: "Jan D." > Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:02:30 +0100 > Cc: emacs devel > > > "Jan D." writes: > > > >> Does this sound familiar to anyone? Shouldn't with and without > >> USE_LISP_UNION_TYPE be the same at runtime? > > > > USE_LISP_UNION_TYPE implies #undef USE_LSB_TAG. It looks like > > USE_LSB_TAG > > does not work on DJGPP. > > Aha, that is it. #undef USE_LSB_TAG also produces a working Emacs. I > guess we should not use USE_LSB_TAG for DJGPP. Is it anyone else who > can dump Emacs with USE_LSB_TAG? I do. USE_LSB_TAG works in the DJGPP port since 18 May 2004, see the entry I made on that day in src/ChangeLog (and the related entry from 15 May, 3 days before that). You should be able to find a thread from those days in emacs-devel's archives where Stefan helped me to find and fix the bug that prevented LSB tags usage in the DJGPP port. > It might be dependent on different versions of djgpp. My version of DJGPP is the same as yours: 2.03, the latest.