From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail mbox-format branch Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:17:33 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <01c49751$Blat.v2.2.2$d2d2ec00@zahav.net.il> References: <41406C46.6050505@pajato.com> <01c4969e$Blat.v2.2.2$d48c9a40@zahav.net.il> <20040909221947.GB11694@fencepost> <01c49717$Blat.v2.2.2$402ab840@zahav.net.il> <01c4972b$Blat.v2.2.2$64073b80@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094833166 11902 80.91.224.253 (10 Sep 2004 16:19:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pmr@pajato.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 18:19:13 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5o7F-0008Kv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:19:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5oCc-0002cw-Ou for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5oCS-0002bm-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5oCQ-0002Zx-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5oCQ-0002Zj-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:24:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5o6z-0008Mm-Nv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.187]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CNI43616 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:18:47 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26975 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26975 > From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) > Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:38:32 +0200 > Cc: pmr@pajato.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > And why delay 21.4 to include somethings which "most users don't use" ?? This goes both ways, you know: if "most users don't use" it, you won't have to delay the release.