From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [patch] minor patch for register.el Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:29:53 -0800 Message-ID: <01FBA24212304894A792B0673AF118DE@us.oracle.com> References: <871uc9mmve.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871uc9l5pk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361482225 7573 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2013 21:30:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "'Bastien'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 21 22:30:47 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8dix-0005gA-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:30:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59542 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8did-0000De-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8diY-0000D2-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8diS-0008Fp-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:47999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8diH-0007z8-UD; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:29:58 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r1LLTtiO025509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:29:55 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1LLTshj004044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:29:55 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r1LLTsKj024852; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:29:54 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:29:54 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <871uc9l5pk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Thread-Index: Ac4QegSgDnNybJFFQ+yA+M/hnfkvWgAADecg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157256 Archived-At: > > Nope, I know nothing about it. Can you give me a URL for > > downloading it? > > http://lumiere.ens.fr/~guerry/u/register-list.el Thanks. > > Feel free to do what you describe, from my point of view. > > At least based on your description it sounds like an improvement. > > I pointed at this library because I see there are some changes > done in register.el and I hope those changes won't conflict with > the ones I plan to make. But as I cannot announce a date when > I'll be able to provide a patch, I cannot freeze register.el > just because I want to work on it... hence this semi-solution > of providing you the link so you can get some ideas. If any changes are made to register.el before you get around to improving it a ta facon, and if those changes make it harder for you, you can always get back today's version from VC. The patch I sent was pretty trivial. And it probably doesn't matter whether it gets applied or not. IOW, if it makes life easier not to apply it, then don't.