From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug tracker spam Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:11:48 -0400 Message-ID: <018wur1m63.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219263221 1983 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2008 20:13:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 20 22:14:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KVu4e-0008HK-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:14:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55085 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KVu3g-00023g-Nl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KVu3M-0001xM-Da for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KVu3K-0001wR-MP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58203 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KVu3K-0001wL-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:58146) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KVu3K-0007uT-Jf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KVu20-0001Pg-Te; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:11:48 -0400 X-Spook: Mossad Consul Baranyi SHA Delta Force CIDA Lexis-Nexis X-Ran: iFh^.qc=mHzB<[uyRpGyfwfGF)lWH54D9dq|ntE X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:57:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102737 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > Take a look at the headers: like every mailing list at gnu.org it is > automatically filtered through a spam and virus checker. OK; though that doesn't rule out extra human moderation. The question remains: how does the spam get into the tracker? And if there's no spam on bug-gnu-emacs, and the tracker spam comes in through some other route, would we lose much by making bug-gnu-emacs the only way to open a new report in the tracker?