From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40919: 27.0.91; next-error-select-buffer does not always behave as documented Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:32:44 +0300 Message-ID: <0138e3ed-2bf7-1d07-b5d1-7a4f3786e865@yandex.ru> References: <53913bd9-2bdc-0f70-f7b4-744283e0512f@ieee.org> <87d07rmb6j.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhau5bfw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <66f63b16-307a-919c-1d25-60ff63f92ae6@ieee.org> <87bln8u3xq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <851cd382-4b2e-447a-2212-919c8a4ce908@ieee.org> <87d07lykkd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bln5rbah.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhaozlvo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v9kr8t1s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zh9yuw5o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <251b7e0d-ef94-e438-4023-a6513b611725@yandex.ru> <87lfl6tojw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a71amsho.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="1819"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: 40919@debbugs.gnu.org, tspiteri@ieee.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 11 01:33:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADY-0000Gh-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 01:33:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADV-0007U3-5p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADO-0007Tv-8W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADN-0008Jj-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADN-0001Kz-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40919 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40919-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40919.15918319735125 (code B ref 40919); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40919) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2020 23:32:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADE-0001Ka-W5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:32:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:55737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jjADD-0001KN-Py for 40919@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:32:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id c71so3360218wmd.5 for <40919@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:32:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6SBnZuj2g99Y6v2nFutxzjwX1kfo4xrIeNtEJEN1PLU=; b=L3kaeydKeHaq+YV79/A+b3T7LhH3MtPEGh1sGD1TTR7ho/E+9tfGrliCNNugd/F8mi DfnoSO8GV+OmvfpWYbvipldwF0PssccL6inV2avIpM4pCfknXxhW+8I9whfBmtlNq402 uStLmzNfxmPoVIZ7EUaZ+x0TwTaJTZVStn2yhvbRZnMTN4aJ5c6f3pJv/xF6c7yKvlG8 3n+v1Qjkg+3PA2JeSn1/iTsz9p20t4PTrj0z5DkaQtl3xKPmPRmMfFi4TqvwkkW48F4D fEgRjhi9FIcnRzFtTz4aTgf6hPibZ2ZUhBQwozx/WSYYLIT6aZBijJLntjR0NjkpCyUX Eq2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6SBnZuj2g99Y6v2nFutxzjwX1kfo4xrIeNtEJEN1PLU=; b=RzpsurAybja6/MVRFgGOFcJhMLLaDL3PBinfHTaANiRVx4VPufwiz2CVMiVgdbvaZI mlLrlmAXyyT5BmXYxViSpP9w14N2lp1t+D4SAqzDB9LhdjJNLcw4Msmh1ONGrOsV1t3l tVPYTkH8LYC1FxtxO+TfXQWbqBGAmRjN+/CKkn3rlBEFymF2bOaupJP+uRlaITB4wsX8 LzmR15vgcstbIyGQfJokGpwsftou3Evgt4rAS285PyG7ZeAlpaDNrzqcYMQXdU+6aoMT hfhXRHQi4wpJq9rH/Tw/6tkkcWRod7yyu1eCUdnuEA8sexrZxwR3BhJKhY8sA+wG8j4y 3ttA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VruCZbK/nEbPlV0EJophxGmE0agbG2cECGFiK72U/YRSht3vz 23fF2VBDUru0p7izw5t1gaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeLLOahZdKDVQKl+PHyhVo7UYb22YloC3gptgVHCievaStppBRJh4heW7jEKn/i4yUhF4qiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb91:: with SMTP id m17mr5548775wmi.126.1591831965971; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y14sm1474067wma.25.2020.06.10.16.32.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:32:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a71amsho.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181845 Archived-At: On 11.06.2020 02:05, Juri Linkov wrote: > Actually, people already want to customize it to a list (at least, I know one such user:) Say hello to the user to me. ;-) And maybe ask a question: what kind of functions do they want to put on there? And/or would they be content to advice-add on next-error-find-buffer-function instead? > -(defcustom next-error-find-buffer-function #'ignore > +(defcustom next-error-find-buffer-function '(ignore) ^s, maybe? > + (or (and (functionp next-error-find-buffer-function) > + (funcall next-error-find-buffer-function avoid-current > + extra-test-inclusive extra-test-exclusive)) > + (and (listp next-error-find-buffer-function) > + (run-hook-with-args-until-success > + 'next-error-find-buffer-function avoid-current > + extra-test-inclusive extra-test-exclusive))) Looks like run_hook_with_args can deal with the case where the value of the hook is a single function. > ;; 2. If next-error-last-buffer is an acceptable buffer, use that. > (if (and next-error-last-buffer > (next-error-buffer-p next-error-last-buffer avoid-current Should we take the rest of the cases in next-error-find-buffer and move them to the default value of the above hook?