From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pankaj Jangid Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: HarfBuzz on MacOS Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:50:46 +0000 Organization: J4D Network Message-ID: <0100016e83ee0db1-02810980-fece-44b5-bcad-f27a3984673e-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <0100016e7e081fd1-2c6756e9-e845-4967-a69f-f6db9c59182d-000000@email.amazonses.com> <0100016e7e28062e-7b2e4c77-a4cb-400f-97ef-63f425a365b1-000000@email.amazonses.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="64711"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 19 14:50:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iX3uD-000Gi2-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:50:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45682 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iX3uB-0001N8-7l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:50:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <0100016e83ee0db1-02810980-fece-44b5-bcad-f27a3984673e-000000@amazonses.com>) id 1iX3u5-0001N2-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <0100016e83ee0db1-02810980-fece-44b5-bcad-f27a3984673e-000000@amazonses.com>) id 1iX3u4-0005qu-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from a8-30.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.8.30]:39770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <0100016e83ee0db1-02810980-fece-44b5-bcad-f27a3984673e-000000@amazonses.com>) id 1iX3u3-0005o2-NR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:50:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=2i3gzvbgh3d3bo7yfqpvb5eru2hqctky; d=j4d.net; t=1574171446; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=oiglgPOyJyZ14gt4aJSHSITpaDiR6RL+cUKqMU9/qrY=; b=yZRHVpUkRuA8KpXJ45vfs8100rCPA8P7jHibaMtdSnVQu8E00TXtmjY9nPc4WIrH OfJMARngiXjONuYfDjx8zwOBzVx9gGz5+8MWv6oAjwhuFwPM1zXlxpzN1xd5XBPwVbb m8vw1G0JkZig4Abe2+zzVGWtoJ+AXkMlOn74IL4E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1574171446; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Feedback-ID; bh=oiglgPOyJyZ14gt4aJSHSITpaDiR6RL+cUKqMU9/qrY=; b=KO4V0YcPzBLPZM8/yjQSioFj8VSJ4qro1lKeuH1CkuhtjNEbMBrxu2oUJKKUA/g9 k+e2Adz6zGEapLfJu/Pi+xuoRpXpfP6pRdIU3GXyjcMbMkteCXqRYPQrJagDx04Wrpj o5IRkYSd2jsVpq/Sw8Y0uggUGXzNbHR+d9p4v7KI= In-Reply-To: (Robert Pluim's message of "Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:39:48 +0100") X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.11.19-54.240.8.30 Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.txOs6RzEvQ8hCXYeLqJ8lVjB3e7LuQl8h6pdq90PbRQ=:AmazonSES X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 54.240.8.30 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242427 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: > I don=CA=BCt know. Coretext works well enough for me, but perhaps it has > deficiencies that aren't obvious to me. Certainly it would be nice to > only have to worry about one shaping library. Yes. That is for sure better.