From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ilya N. Golubev" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: checking for fields Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:47:51 +0400 Message-ID: <00odu43g6w.fsf@mo.msk.ru> References: <13lkpeawcu.fsf@mo.msk.ru> <02473b3c6f4154-gin@mo.msk.ru> <02473b40868335-gin@mo.msk.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156799768 25399 80.91.229.2 (28 Aug 2006 21:16:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 28 23:16:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHoSh-0002JV-4f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:16:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHoSg-00027o-GD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHlDf-0005a5-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHlDc-0005WF-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHlDb-0005W5-KP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.213.85.9] (helo=d-fens.mopniei.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GHlMW-00042y-W0; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: from d-fens.mopniei.ru (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by d-fens.mopniei.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7SHltmP013512; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:47:55 +0400 Original-Received: (from gin@localhost) by d-fens.mopniei.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k7SHlpHx013510; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:47:51 +0400 X-Authentication-Warning: d-fens.mopniei.ru: gin set sender to gin@mo.msk.ru using -f Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:25:06 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:15:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15280 Archived-At: > Until 21 release, it was to do so. > Quite the contrary! That was the best time to report them. The whole > point of pretesting Emacs 21 It was *impossible* to do such a by users with no special privileges. Thought that said it quite clearly by the following. > > from release 21 one. But at that time emacs > > cvs was not publicly readable. Or, in the plainest way: emacs cvs containing release 21 development sources was closed for anonymous reading for quite a long before release 21.1. On 2001-06-29, 2001-07-02 at least. Fortunately, release 22 sources were readable anonymously last time I checked. Perhaps will even try them - in my copious free time (). Anyway, please keep them open, do not duplicate your policy wrt release 21 on them.