From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eliminating "changed in Emacs outside of Customize" Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:29:21 +0100 Message-ID: <00eb01c509c2$1a870990$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107416752 26375 80.91.229.2 (3 Feb 2005 07:45:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, abraham@dina.kvl.dk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 08:45:51 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwbgO-0001Wl-Az for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:45:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cwbtf-0005Vb-MJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CwbsX-0004ou-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:58:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cwbo6-00043x-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cwbo1-0003wo-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:53:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.110] (helo=av3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwbQr-0003GI-Kz; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: by av3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C4F5D37E4A; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:29:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.164]) by av3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DA137E49; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:29:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t2o58p169.telia.com [62.20.165.169]) by smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B005D37E47; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:29:38 +0100 (CET) Original-To: , "Drew Adams" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32798 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32798 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Stallman" > That seems correct to me. In particular, it means you can edit the > defcustom and eval the edited one, and the edit takes effect. Does not defface works differently in this respect?