From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Indentation contest nxml vs xml-mode Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:50:48 -0800 Message-ID: <00a601c87fba$febc3150$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <47D03AE7.8070408@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204829493 24074 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2008 18:51:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:51:33 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)'" , "'Emacs Devel'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 19:51:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXLBr-0004oM-B8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:51:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXLBJ-0006lq-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXLBE-0006lP-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:51:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXLBC-0006l5-8L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:50:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXLBC-0006l2-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:50:58 -0500 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXLBB-0007XD-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:50:58 -0500 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m26IoooF003310; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:50:50 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m26De2fv020019; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:50:49 -0700 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3602497391204829443; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:50:43 -0800 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.72.2) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:50:43 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <47D03AE7.8070408@gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: Ach/uhtgzId+BGTXTiKpghSySeHz1QAAMj5w X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91537 Archived-At: > Try indenting the following in nxml-mode and xml-mode: > > > > Duh > > > > > I think xml-mode wins here. If I remember correctly there are > also some > bugs in nxml-mode indentattion code. Is there any reason to have both > ways of indenting, ie should not nxml-mode indentation use > the xml-mode indentation code? Can you please just present the two alternatives here, so we don't have to go through the exercise? Thx.