From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: uppercase var names in docstrings Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:33:12 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <00a101c4b887$271156c0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <002001c4b87a$2b95e060$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <20041022222639.GA5437@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098484417 21238 80.91.229.6 (22 Oct 2004 22:33:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 23 00:33:29 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL7yT-0003aM-00 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:33:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CL85z-0003yv-IJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CL85j-0003vn-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CL85i-0003vL-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CL85i-0003vI-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.10.115] (helo=av1-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CL7xu-0006ns-Df; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:32:54 -0400 Original-Received: by av1-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id A68C837ED5; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:32:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.182]) by av1-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974B737E59; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:32:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t2o58p22.telia.com [62.20.165.22]) by smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id BB35B37E46; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:32:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Miles Bader" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28754 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28754 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Miles Bader" : > maybe bold italics is less rugged than just italics? : : Ha ha, try "much more"... They are less rugged, statistically. That is of course what counts. They just looks more rugged.