From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eliminating "changed in Emacs outside of Customize" Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:25:48 +0100 Message-ID: <008f01c508a4$9d9ae500$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <87lla8xdps.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107293288 24124 80.91.229.2 (1 Feb 2005 21:28:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Per Abrahamsen , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 01 22:28:07 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cw5Yu-0004KZ-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 22:27:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cw5lt-0001eN-J1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cw5ki-0001BK-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cw5kb-000156-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:39:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cw5ka-00014V-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:39:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.9.114] (helo=av5-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cw5X6-00024e-3v; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: by av5-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6F80537E49; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:25:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.178]) by av5-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6001937E42; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:25:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t1o58p200.telia.com [62.20.164.200]) by smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0206C38007; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:25:57 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" , "Drew Adams" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32725 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32725 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Monnier" > (e.g. in a mode-hook or in one of the many poorly written major modes that > happily mess up global variables). Following Per A's suggestion to distinguish between defcustom variables (that should not be changed by code) and defvar (that may be changed by code) it is perhaps not to difficult to look for code that changes defcustoms?