From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: crazy interaction between buffer-locality and function-localityof variables Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:31:25 -0800 Message-ID: <008801c93d29$facd93e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <9aa0cfde0811012034h30c79d6cxa66f6ee0754e027d@mail.gmail.com><9aa0cfde0811020943l24121f8cj78bbf82709036f9d@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225657887 11962 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2008 20:31:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" , "'Ami Fischman'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 02 21:32:29 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KwjcZ-0005YA-Sb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:32:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KwjbS-0006ap-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:31:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KwjbO-0006a0-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KwjbM-0006YF-Bp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49954 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KwjbM-0006Xp-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:31:12 -0500 Original-Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:39700 helo=rgminet12.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KwjbL-0006Lc-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (mail-router.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rgminet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mA2KV3YY022828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:31:04 GMT Original-Received: from agmgw1.us.oracle.com (agmgw1.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.212]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mA2KV6j1005676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:31:08 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt706.oracle.com (acsmt706.oracle.com [141.146.40.84]) by agmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id mA2KV3JT020089; Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:31:03 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.23.165.218) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:31:02 +0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Thread-Index: Ack9Jni1mz8juGwyT+21tPvZwDhQ/QAAxF+A X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Source-IP: agmgw1.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.212] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A09020B.490E0E0A.0004:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105269 Archived-At: > Hmm... at the place you mentioned in the elisp.info, we're kind of far > from discussing naming conventions, but I'll try and add a cross-ref. I'm not following this closely, but an illustrative example of the problem, in the doc, would help understanding. It's presumably the _reason_ for the naming convention (that is, the problem the convention tries to avoid) that it is important to understand.